https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-870 Lustre <p>We are seeing frequent messages like this:</p> <p>Nov 21 12:20:58 hype352 kernel: LustreError: 7689:0:(osc_request.c:1229:can_merge_pages()) is it ok to have flags 0x420 and 0x5a8 in the same brw?</p> <p>on the console of 2.1 lustre clients. That is a pretty terrible console message. One way or another we need to eliminate it.</p> <p>If it is a problem, we need to fix whatever is going one. If there is no problem, the message needs to be removed from the console.</p> 2.1.0-12chaos, <a href="https://github.com/chaos/lustre">https://github.com/chaos/lustre</a> LU-870

Console message: "is it ok to have flags 0x420 and 0x5a8 in the same brw?"

Bug Minor Resolved Duplicate Zhenyu Xu Christopher Morrone Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:31:08 +0000 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:18:34 +0000 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:18:34 +0000 0 0 <p>The flags that are different appear to be:</p> <p>0x100 = OBD_BRW_NOQUOTA<br/> 0x080 = OBD_BRW_NOCACHE<br/> 0x008 = OBD_BRW_SYNC</p> <p>There was a patch recently merged to master to address OBD_BRW_NOQUOTA issue from <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-651" title="Strange error message &quot;is it ok to have flags 0x... and 0x... in the same brw?&quot;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-651"><del>LU-651</del></a>:</p> <p><a href="http://review.whamcloud.com/1328" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://review.whamcloud.com/1328</a></p> <p>The other flags are already excluded in 2.1.</p> <p>Closing this as a duplicate of <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-651" title="Strange error message &quot;is it ok to have flags 0x... and 0x... in the same brw?&quot;" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-651"><del>LU-651</del></a>. It looks like the referenced patch is not the correct way to resolve this issue.</p> Development Rank 1|hzvhpj: Rank (Obsolete) 6518 Severity