https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8958 Lustre <p>There is a fair amount of easy cleanup that can be done now that lloop has been removed. The LL_MRF_RETURN macros can be removed. Several autoconf defines/checks are no longer referenced:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>HAVE_QC_MAKE_REQUEST_FN HAVE_VOID_MAKE_REQUEST_FN HAVE_BIO_ENDIO_USES_ONE_ARG HAVE_REQUEST_QUEUE_UNPLUG_FN HAVE_BLKDEV_RELEASE_RETURN_INT </pre> </div></div> <p>ll_iocontrol_register(), ll_iocontrol_unregister(), ll_iocontrol_call(), and the llioc* structures can be removed.</p> <p>ll_direct_rw_pages() is not longer used outside of llite and should be merged with ll_direct_IO_seg(). struct ll_dio_pages() can be removed.</p> <p>In sanity.sh the LLOOP and LLITELOOPLOAD variables and the function cleanup_68() are unused.</p> LU-8958

remove code left unused after lloop removal

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed James A Simmons John Hammond Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:44:41 +0000 Fri, 16 Mar 2018 19:30:50 +0000 Sat, 5 Aug 2017 01:09:22 +0000 Lustre 2.10.1 Lustre 2.11.0 0 5 <p>James Simmons (uja.ornl@yahoo.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/26795" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/26795</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8958" title="remove code left unused after lloop removal" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8958"><del>LU-8958</del></a> llite: remove llite_loop left overs<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: b24531e09e9d353ca4fc8fe59715ff6d489d22fd</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/26795/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/26795/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8958" title="remove code left unused after lloop removal" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8958"><del>LU-8958</del></a> llite: remove llite_loop left overs<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 2e875d5fc5b73f735bd42f5da54c23e4c2d35d5c</p> <p>Minh Diep (minh.diep@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/28860" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/28860</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8958" title="remove code left unused after lloop removal" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8958"><del>LU-8958</del></a> llite: remove llite_loop left overs<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_10<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: fd9bd1443e60c19c84bf353ee07b8168edf02227</p> <p>John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/28860/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/28860/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8958" title="remove code left unused after lloop removal" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8958"><del>LU-8958</del></a> llite: remove llite_loop left overs<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_10<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 3ba8d19859efdeaade66de15060dfde4be794115</p> <p>Hi Simmons, have you noticed that the kernel's loop device can't do direct IO over 64KB, and it seems there is no way to increase the size of max_sectors_size, etc. Not sure if you have done this before but please let me know if I missed something</p> <p>I can ask the VFS guys about this. I have to ask why the interest in this? Originally the only use of llite_lloop was for running swap on a lustre mount.</p> <p>Potentially this would be good to support access to bunch of small files.</p> Related LU-8844 Development Rank 1|hzyyrj: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity