https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972 Lustre <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/57cc8712-c9db-11e6-af18-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/57cc8712-c9db-11e6-af18-5254006e85c2</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_101 failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>File hasn't object on OST </pre> </div></div> <p>Info required for matching: conf-sanity 101</p> <p> </p> <p>This is quite new issue which starts to happen since yesterday, it can be related to some recent commits.</p> LU-8972

conf-sanity test_101: File hasn't object on OST

Bug Major Resolved Fixed Alex Zhuravlev Maloo Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:07:07 +0000 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:01:00 +0000 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:01:00 +0000 Lustre 2.9.0 Lustre 2.12.0 0 12 <p>I see that this issue happens quite often right now in Maloo. Failure rate is about 50% right now</p> <p>failed test 101 was introduced in <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8562" title="osp_precreate_cleanup_orphans/osp_precreate_reserve race may cause data loss" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8562"><del>LU-8562</del></a></p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/24517" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/24517</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> tests: Disable conf-sanity test 101<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 12a9eee4334df25f1445a53e5b544de561c33a1b</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> tests: Disable conf-sanity test 101<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: fa722ccf04fe6c386628ea5a575165c173643800</p> <p>another on master:<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/08853232-cc1d-11e6-bb5d-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/08853232-cc1d-11e6-bb5d-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>I'm disappointed that <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/24517/</a> was fast-tracked through the landing process with no explanation or discussion. The lack of transparency is a bit alarming given that the failing test is designed to catch filesystem data loss. To make matters worse, the test results are hidden behind a login screen so there is no public way to discern why you might have decided to disable the test.</p> <p>Assigning to James to reproduce in manual mode and validate where the test is going wrong to identify next steps.</p> <p>Alex Zhuravlev (alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25079" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25079</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> osp: skip subsequent orphan cleanups<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: c2c5dcb106efdf290a93e7c91dcf48a09f5512b6</p> <p>Reassigning to Alex since he has a patch in flight for the issue.</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25079/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25079/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> osp: skip subsequent orphan cleanups<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 6f56f71b407a8c14db4c2accd37da5b4feecde1a</p> <p>Landed for 2.10</p> <p>Hongchao Zhang (hongchao.zhang@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25687" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25687</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> osp: delete orphans when precreate failed<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: e1ed33d0adf87cf85e7ee645d68dfafa05e8ce6c</p> <p> It would be nice to have a better description of the problem here and why it's not so easy to fix.</p> <p>Alex Zhuravlev (alexey.zhuravlev@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25924" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25924</a><br/> Subject: Revert "<a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> osp: skip subsequent orphan cleanups"<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 26f13abe4326d641e9e98f339400c26560117b78</p> <p>The conf-sanity test_101 is still in ALWAYS_EXCEPT, so this needs to be fixed before closing this ticket.</p> <p>James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/32220" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/32220</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> tests: remove conf-sanity test from ALWAYS_EXCEPT<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 9673a14d4427f3a107272d16e498aec2e282901a</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/32220/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/32220/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8972" title="conf-sanity test_101: File hasn&#39;t object on OST" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-8972"><del>LU-8972</del></a> tests: remove conf-sanity test from ALWAYS_EXCEPT<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 60c5a6fd35d4d819b61b4f58b33fdd3baefd52e4</p> <p>Patch to remove conf-sanity from the ALWAYS_EXCEPT list landed to master. Resolving issue.</p> Duplicate Related LU-8562 LU-9285 Development Rank 1|hzyz93: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity