<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:23:35 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-9140] sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/16f600cc-f85e-11e6-b8e5-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/16f600cc-f85e-11e6-b8e5-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From test_log:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;Limited write rate: 20, read rate: 5
Verify the write rate is under TBF control
Write speed is 4.91903
Verify the read rate is under TBF control
Read speed is 19.5095
 sanityn test_77j: @@@@@@ FAIL: The read rate (19.5095) exceeds 110% of preset rate (5) 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Info required for matching: sanityn 77j&lt;br/&gt;
Info required for matching: sanityn 77k&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>trevis-38vm3 thru 6, Full Group test, &lt;br/&gt;
RHEL7.3/ldiskfs, branch master, v2.9.53.19.gdad9ce4, b3534, &lt;br/&gt;
SLES 12.2 client&lt;br/&gt;
</environment>
        <key id="44015">LU-9140</key>
            <summary>sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="2" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/critical.svg">Critical</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="qian">Qian Yingjin</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jcasper">James Casper</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:40:34 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:50:48 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:09:46 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.10.0</version>
                    <version>Lustre 2.11.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.11.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.10.2</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>13</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="187091" author="bogl" created="Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:44:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/344078ec-0173-11e7-9255-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/344078ec-0173-11e7-9255-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="188348" author="emoly.liu" created="Wed, 15 Mar 2017 01:12:09 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c5cefc54-08c9-11e7-8c9f-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c5cefc54-08c9-11e7-8c9f-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="188352" author="emoly.liu" created="Wed, 15 Mar 2017 01:30:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=qian&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;qian&quot;&gt;qian&lt;/a&gt;, could you please have a look at this issue? test_77j was introduced by &lt;del&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-5620&quot; title=&quot;nrs tbf policy based on opcode&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-5620&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-5620&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/del&gt; and now its failure rate is about &quot;6.00% of last 100 runs, 0 skipped (all branches) &quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="188575" author="qian" created="Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:03:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It is a very strange bug. I can not reproduce it in my test environment. I was thought it caused by the CPT &amp;gt; 1 as the rate limit per server would reach CPT * rate. But I Checked the failure log of the testbed all with CPT = 1. Maybe the reproduce of this failure is dependent with other test cases?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="188678" author="casperjx" created="Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:30:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Seen again with 2.9.54 tag:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/93d0b46a-0a02-11e7-9053-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/93d0b46a-0a02-11e7-9053-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/1a6bc6e8-0a05-11e7-9053-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/1a6bc6e8-0a05-11e7-9053-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We run the full group on 7 configs, and this seems to move around those configs (failed 2 of 7 times on .53 and .54).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="188922" author="qian" created="Mon, 20 Mar 2017 05:45:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I have ran the test more than 100 times for a Lustre configure with 7 OSTs, but it does not reproduce...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;error()
{
 echo &lt;span class=&quot;code-quote&quot;&gt;&quot;$@&quot;&lt;/span&gt;
 exit 1
}
pushd lustre-release/lustre/tests
&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; ((i=1; i&amp;lt;=100; i++))
&lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;do&lt;/span&gt;
 ONLY=&lt;span class=&quot;code-quote&quot;&gt;&quot;77a 77b 77c 77d 77e 77f 77i 77j&quot;&lt;/span&gt; RUNAS_ID=1000 sh sanityn.sh
 [ $? -ne 0 ] &amp;amp;&amp;amp; error &lt;span class=&quot;code-quote&quot;&gt;&quot;FAILED $i testing&quot;&lt;/span&gt;
done
popd
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="190718" author="sbuisson" created="Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:02:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f9d4cb54-1897-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/f9d4cb54-1897-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191369" author="simmonsja" created="Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:33:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Still broken &lt;img class=&quot;emoticon&quot; src=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/sad.png&quot; height=&quot;16&quot; width=&quot;16&quot; align=&quot;absmiddle&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191741" author="yujian" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:05:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is blocking patch review testing on master branch:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9d3acb4c-1db4-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9d3acb4c-1db4-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/864f7644-1f6c-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/864f7644-1f6c-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a5d1ef7e-1f08-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a5d1ef7e-1f08-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1cbc0492-1ef2-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1cbc0492-1ef2-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192023" author="adilger" created="Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:56:10 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is failing 5-10x per day so is causing some significant interference with new patch testing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect that the problem may relate to running in a VM, or possibly because there are so few RPCs?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Qian, please review one of the test results above (they should all be run with -1 debugging, e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_logs/8ce9c52c-1f6c-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2/show_text&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_logs/8ce9c52c-1f6c-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2/show_text&lt;/a&gt; ) to see why NRS is not handling this properly.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192027" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:59:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26615&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26615&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: disable sanityn test_77j and test_77k&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 6225bfd533457ca364ff5bde613f0cf86f130f38&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192054" author="qian" created="Fri, 14 Apr 2017 03:29:41 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Andreas, I am sorry&#160;that the debugging log in NRS TBF is not enough for identifiing the problem. It needs to add new debug log to see what happend in NRS TBF.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192092" author="bogl" created="Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:46:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1ff0c23e-20db-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1ff0c23e-20db-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192314" author="adilger" created="Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:29:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Qian, can you please submit a patch that adds the required debugging to the test and/or the kernel.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192378" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:15:27 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26615/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26615/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: disable sanityn test_77j and test_77k&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: e9b0c8b55c100e1d86093636309b385a913e927e&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192392" author="lixi" created="Tue, 18 Apr 2017 02:18:55 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Although it is still unclear to me how this problem happens, I am wondering whether we should use a special RPC type to check the rate of RPC. The software stack and also cache stack of read/write is too deap, and the speed of read/write could be affected by a lot of factors. So in order to check the speed of RPC control, a RPC type (e.g. &quot;lfs advise&quot;) could be used.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192419" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:55:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yingjin Qian (qian@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: add some debug log for NRS TBF&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: ad151f5adee39af6b786f36ccc7263c43dcfbfb5&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194672" author="pjones" created="Fri, 5 May 2017 14:39:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Qian&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do the results from the run with the denig patch give you a fuller picture as to what the problem is here?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194776" author="qian" created="Mon, 8 May 2017 02:01:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Peter&#65292;&lt;br/&gt;
Yes, I think the debug patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701&lt;/a&gt;&#160;can help to identify the problem. I used the similar debug log to find out the failure reason of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9227&quot; title=&quot;Changing rate of a TBF rule loses control in some testcases&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe the merged patch of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9227&quot; title=&quot;Changing rate of a TBF rule loses control in some testcases&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; have already solved the problem.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194904" author="adilger" created="Mon, 8 May 2017 18:23:37 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This subtest is still failing for patches that include the &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9227&quot; title=&quot;Changing rate of a TBF rule loses control in some testcases&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9227&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9227&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; fix:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/a2b0f3f4-33d4-11e7-b0a8-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/a2b0f3f4-33d4-11e7-b0a8-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/abff3518-3278-11e7-8847-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/abff3518-3278-11e7-8847-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
 &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/fcf81bb0-32f5-11e7-814a-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/fcf81bb0-32f5-11e7-814a-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&apos;ll land the debug patch and try to catch some failures with the added debugging information.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195135" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 9 May 2017 17:20:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26701/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: add some debug log for NRS TBF&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: e0deeb237ae111e959e916ae910d15272ed4c120&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195721" author="jamesanunez" created="Fri, 12 May 2017 18:30:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;There are at least two test sessions that have the new debug information in them. I found the messages in the OST debug_logs for &lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9951bf06-36e4-11e7-b0a8-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9951bf06-36e4-11e7-b0a8-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9fd5daee-3700-11e7-8847-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/sub_tests/9fd5daee-3700-11e7-8847-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195798" author="qian" created="Mon, 15 May 2017 12:11:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;After analyzed the debug log, I found that the total time to write 100MB data is about 200s (becaused of network congestion, I think), so the measured I/O performance by dd is nearly 0.5MB/s, but the output of dd is used &apos;kB/s&apos; as the unit autoatically, so the number is about 500. I think we can fix this bug in the sanityn.sh tbf_verify by adjusting the output result by dd according to its unit &apos;MB/s&apos;, &apos;GB/s&apos; or &apos;kB/s&apos;.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195802" author="adilger" created="Mon, 15 May 2017 13:00:55 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Would it be better to just compute the expected runtime for I/O based on the TBF limit, and then compare the actual runtime to expected, instead of parsing the output of &quot;dd&quot;?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason the IO is so slow is because these tests are run in a VM that may be using a shared disk also used by another VM guest. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195816" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 15 May 2017 14:18:35 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yingjin Qian (qian@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/27110&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/27110&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: adjust measured IOPS according to dd output&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1f9030a3624cabf633913edc84376486defa1719&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="195819" author="qian" created="Mon, 15 May 2017 14:24:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Andreas,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just finished&#160;a patch to ajust the measured IOPS according to the unit of dd output.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The patch above is more&#160;intuitive; while your suggestion is much simpler.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you think the comparson by using runtime is much better, I will push a new patch sooner.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="196852" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 24 May 2017 07:33:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/27110/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/27110/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: calculate the measured rate according to dd runtime&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 5fb7d63e7d5ccd05f39b74b5c79d1856798477c7&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="196872" author="pjones" created="Wed, 24 May 2017 12:22:18 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.10&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="200036" author="sarah" created="Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:58:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;It looks like the issue hasn&apos;t been resolved. there is syntax error&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/cb4e36e6-52c9-11e7-bacf-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/cb4e36e6-52c9-11e7-bacf-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
tag 2.9.59&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;test log&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;trevis-3vm6: 1048576 bytes (1.0 MB, 1.0 MiB) copied, 0.0449807 s, 23.3 MB/s
trevis-3vm5: 1+0 records in
trevis-3vm5: 1+0 records out
trevis-3vm5: 1048576 bytes (1.0 MB, 1.0 MiB) copied, 0.0186742 s, 56.2 MB/s
Limited write rate: 20, read rate: 5
Verify the write rate is under TBF control
(standard_in) 1: illegal character: M
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
Write runtime is MiB) s, speed is  IOPS
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/sanityn.sh: line 3163: [: -eq: unary operator expected
 sanityn test_77j: @@@@@@ FAIL: The write rate () exceeds 110% of preset rate (20) 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="200038" author="qian" created="Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:55:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;From the test log above, the format of dd output has been changed, so the parsing result is incorrect. I will make a patch sooner.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="200566" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:30:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yingjin Qian (qian@ddn.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/27878&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/27878&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: measure the runtime of dd directly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 8e5988cdf728577db247afd98525a6bc1bcb7ad2&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208337" author="bogl" created="Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:40:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on b2_10:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a9d32abe-9903-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a9d32abe-9903-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208351" author="bogl" created="Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:54:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bb51f0ae-991c-11e7-ba20-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bb51f0ae-991c-11e7-ba20-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="210930" author="bogl" created="Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:02:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;more on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bf2cc154-af15-11e7-943d-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bf2cc154-af15-11e7-943d-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2c690a30-af38-11e7-9eeb-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2c690a30-af38-11e7-9eeb-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211216" author="yujian" created="Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:45:00 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;+1 on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1da465c8-addd-11e7-bb19-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1da465c8-addd-11e7-bb19-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211505" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:06:31 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/27878/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/27878/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: measure the runtime of dd directly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 66abf6ffe9f032aaa7c271ee2bd1f9b569058bd5&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211507" author="pjones" created="Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:09:46 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.11&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211546" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 19 Oct 2017 21:16:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Minh Diep (minh.diep@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/29686&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/29686&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: measure the runtime of dd directly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_10&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: bf27231ae6224598e2f04b2d937fd83c159dc58c&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="212086" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:08:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/29686/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/29686/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9140&quot; title=&quot;sanityn test_77j test_77k: The read / write rate exceeds x% of preset rate&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9140&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9140&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; nrs: measure the runtime of dd directly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_10&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 53604724c3e5dd2032303e22511f7be230d4feae&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="45371">LU-9308</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is related to ">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="44863">LU-9227</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzz4lj:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>