https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9202 Lustre <p>The logs show that:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>Mar 6 08:36:33 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) srv-lfs1-MDT0000: Cannot find sequence 0x200000e84012d82: rc = -2 Mar 6 08:36:33 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) srv-lfs1-MDT0000: Cannot find sequence 0x200000f3600fa05: rc = -2 Mar 6 08:36:33 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) Skipped 64 previous similar messages Mar 6 08:36:34 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) srv-lfs1-MDT0000: Cannot find sequence 0x200000eb0015479: rc = -2 Mar 6 08:36:34 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) Skipped 1167 previous similar messages Mar 6 08:36:40 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) srv-lfs1-MDT0000: Cannot find sequence 0x200000e98017922: rc = -2 Mar 6 08:36:40 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(fld_handler.c:260:fld_server_lookup()) Skipped 3870 previous similar messages Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(lfsck_layout.c:284:lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures()) ASSERTION( ltd != ((void *)0) ) failed: Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: LustreError: 9819:0:(lfsck_layout.c:284:lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures()) LBUG Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: Pid: 9819, comm: lfsck_layout Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: Call Trace: Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa02cd875&gt;] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa02cde77&gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa0cceb91&gt;] lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures+0x4c1/0x4d0 [lfsck] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa0ca64b2&gt;] lfsck_assistant_notify_others+0x5d2/0x1490 [lfsck] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa0ca9cf0&gt;] lfsck_assistant_engine+0x930/0x1e50 [lfsck] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff81060530&gt;] ? __dequeue_entity+0x30/0x50 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff810672b0&gt;] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffffa0ca93c0&gt;] ? lfsck_assistant_engine+0x0/0x1e50 [lfsck] Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff810a0fce&gt;] kthread+0x9e/0xc0 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff8100c28a&gt;] child_rip+0xa/0x20 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff810a0f30&gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xc0 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: [&lt;ffffffff8100c280&gt;] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 Mar 6 08:36:44 lfs-sa-mds kernel: </pre> </div></div> LU-9202

lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures()) ASSERTION( ltd != ((void *)0) ) failed

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed nasf nasf Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:02:45 +0000 Fri, 3 Aug 2018 17:45:22 +0000 Tue, 16 May 2017 13:36:04 +0000 Lustre 2.10.0 0 4 <p>Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25931" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25931</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9202" title="lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures()) ASSERTION( ltd != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9202"><del>LU-9202</del></a> lfsck: skip unavailable targets when sync failures<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 0817aa25ea2117a0fcfa5e7763ec47f790bfcc72</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/25931/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/25931/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9202" title="lfsck_layout_assistant_sync_failures()) ASSERTION( ltd != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9202"><del>LU-9202</del></a> lfsck: skip unavailable targets when sync failures<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: e96c70e04ff2644909b96d94d4718117f7402a40</p> <p>Landed for 2.10</p> <p>Is this safe to back port to b2_8 ? We see this on our 2.8 servers</p> Duplicate Related Development Rank 1|hzz6m7: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity