<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:24:53 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-9292] mount.lustre doesn&apos;t handle partitioned MD arrays correctly</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9292</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;The set_blockdev_tunables function in lustre/utils/mount_lustre.c doesn&apos;t correctly parse the newer names of partitioned MD devices (e.g., /dev/md0p2) .. it looks like it&apos;s written to parse the older partitioned MD devices (e.g., /dev/md_d2p3).&lt;br/&gt;
This means that MD partions like /dev/md0p2 do not receive MD-level tunings that non-partitioned MD devices get (specifically stripe_cache_size), leading to a large performance hit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="45303">LU-9292</key>
            <summary>mount.lustre doesn&apos;t handle partitioned MD arrays correctly</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="utopiabound">Nathaniel Clark</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jadhav.vikram">VIKRAM BABASO JADHAV</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:11:56 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:08:44 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:16:03 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.10.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="190837" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:27:32 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;jadhav.vikram (jadhav.vikram@seagate.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26399&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26399&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9292&quot; title=&quot;mount.lustre doesn&amp;#39;t handle partitioned MD arrays correctly&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9292&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9292&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; utils: handle partitioned MD arrays correctly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: aaeee334dc15c81ddea0fa180a227d6c9be81d44&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192400" author="pjones" created="Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:05:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Nathaniel&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could you please review this patch?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193519" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:39:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26399/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26399/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9292&quot; title=&quot;mount.lustre doesn&amp;#39;t handle partitioned MD arrays correctly&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9292&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9292&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; utils: handle partitioned MD arrays correctly&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1582846e218a7c4953bc0af2165f0af103657a77&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193561" author="pjones" created="Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:16:03 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.10&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10010">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is duplicated by">
                                                        </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                            <issuelinktype id="10011">
                    <name>Related</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is related to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="45739">LU-9405</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzz9br:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>