<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:25:01 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-9306] sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &apos;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&apos; </title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;sanity_hsm test_24d is failing. From the test log, we wait for an update for over 200 seconds:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;CMD: onyx-39vm7 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdt.lustre-MDT0000.hsm.actions | awk &apos;/&apos;0x200000405:0x24:0x0&apos;.*action=&apos;ARCHIVE&apos;/ {print \$13}&apos; | cut -f2 -d=
CMD: onyx-39vm7 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdt.lustre-MDT0000.hsm.actions | awk &apos;/&apos;0x200000405:0x24:0x0&apos;.*action=&apos;ARCHIVE&apos;/ {print \$13}&apos; | cut -f2 -d=
Update not seen after 200s: wanted &apos;SUCCEED&apos; got &apos;STARTED&apos;
 sanity-hsm test_24d: @@@@@@ FAIL: request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is nothing obviously wrong in the console logs for any of the nodes. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The copytool_log for this test is nearly empty and doesn&#8217;t provide any information on what is causing this problem. The full copytool_log for this test is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;1491012689.288932 lhsmtool_posix[24069]: action=0 src=(null) dst=(null) mount_point=/mnt/lustre3
1491012689.334255 lhsmtool_posix[24070]: waiting for message from kernel
exiting: Terminated
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This test failure could be leading to a cascade of failures. After test 24d fails, the following tests fail 24e, 24f, 25b, 26, 27b, 28, 29b, 29c, 30b, 30c, 31b, and many more. I don&#8217;t know if all the failures are related, but we should clean up the first test that&#8217;s failing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So far, I&#8217;ve only seen this test fail for review-dne-part-2. So, the issue may be DNE related?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This test started to fail on the master branch on 2017-03-25 and has failed about 19 times since then. The patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8911&quot; title=&quot;tests: sanity-hsm test_24d fails on a local setup (1 node)&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-8911&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-8911&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/24185/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/24185/&lt;/a&gt;, is the last patch that made modifications to this test and sanity-hsm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are links to some of the failed test logs:&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-06 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/81096390-1ae7-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/81096390-1ae7-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-05 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad0ce212-1a3f-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/ad0ce212-1a3f-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-05 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/28ab074e-19ed-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/28ab074e-19ed-11e7-b742-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-05 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2bd0287a-19cd-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2bd0287a-19cd-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-04 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/550c4e1a-1952-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/550c4e1a-1952-11e7-9de9-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
2017-04-03 - &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d986e31e-18c9-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d986e31e-18c9-11e7-8920-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="45357">LU-9306</key>
            <summary>sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &apos;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&apos; </summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/blocker.svg">Blocker</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="jhammond">John Hammond</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jamesanunez">James Nunez</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Fri, 7 Apr 2017 19:30:56 +0000</created>
                <updated>Mon, 29 May 2017 05:52:02 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 5 May 2017 03:21:14 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.10.0</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.10.0</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>8</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="191669" author="jamesanunez" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:03:57 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Quentin - Would you please take a look at this issue? There are a couple of problems here; test 24d is failing at a high rate and the test is not cleaning up properly after itself and leaving the file system as read only. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your patch for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8911&quot; title=&quot;tests: sanity-hsm test_24d fails on a local setup (1 node)&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-8911&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-8911&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/24185/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/24185/&lt;/a&gt;, was the last to modify this test.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191671" author="bougetq" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:08:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;On it&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191690" author="bougetq" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:58:59 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The cleanup is not done correctly because test_24d calls&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;trap cleanup_test_24d EXIT
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;before&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;copytool_setup $SINGLEAGT &lt;span class=&quot;code-quote&quot;&gt;&quot;$MOUNT3&quot;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;which sets its own trap on EXIT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have a function to stack traps, I am working on integrating it in sanity-hsm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As to why the test itself fails, I must say I still have no idea.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191692" author="bougetq" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:13:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;James,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could you tell me when was the last time test_9a and test_29d were run please?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191695" author="jamesanunez" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:30:33 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Quentin, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Both sanity-hsm test 9a and test 29d are skipped because they require three or more clients. I reviewed results for these tests for the past two years and found the last time test 9a was not skipped was September 9, 2015 and earlier; it actually passed 13 times between February and September, 2015. Test 29d was skipped for this whole period. &lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="191708" author="bougetq" created="Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:26:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192285" author="adilger" created="Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:22:40 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This test has failed 25x in the past week, as often as 7x in a single day.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192299" author="adilger" created="Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:03:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The first recent failure was 2017-03-25 with test &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/82d3a2da-115f-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/82d3a2da-115f-11e7-9073-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt; which was right after the ZFS Snapshot feature was landed on 2017-03-23.  It makes sense to look at the patches that landed on that day to see if any of them could have caused this.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192316" author="pjones" created="Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:38:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Could this have been caused by any of the ZFS Snapshots patches?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Peter&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192658" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:04:46 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Quentin Bouget (quentin.bouget@cea.fr) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26734&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26734&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: sanity-hsm, register traps in a better order&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: abfc0251f892862145c7576912640cce841fd7ba&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192969" author="yong.fan" created="Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:22:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I cannot establish the relationship between the current sanity-hsm test_24d failure and the snapshot patches. The unique possible relation is the test_24d will try to check HSM actions with client mounted as read-only that seems something affected by the patch &quot;0001-&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-8900&quot; title=&quot;Lustre snapshot based on ZFS backend&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-8900&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-8900&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;-snapshot-simulate-readonly-device.patch&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/24267&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/24267&lt;/a&gt;). But in fact, such patch almost has nothing related with HSM. So I have to make some debug patch to collect more information.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192970" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:23:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26770&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26770&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: more debug info for hsm test_24d&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 8c7c03ff53e5c5f63da6e99f42c3124c4f5c2d29&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="192992" author="sguminsx" created="Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:57:02 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Another on master:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/991eb176-e246-4d8f-bcca-2a62fc2e179f&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sessions/991eb176-e246-4d8f-bcca-2a62fc2e179f&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193524" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:42:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26770/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26770/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: more debug info for hsm test_24d&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: fc7c513b4cbcc8775076f6490f2df03b52cf4051&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193565" author="pjones" created="Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:18:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.10&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193590" author="jamesanunez" created="Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:41:51 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m reopening this ticket because it&apos;s not clear to me that the root cause of sanity-hsm test 24 failures is known/fixed and I&apos;d still like to see Quentin&apos;s patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/26734/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/26734/&lt;/a&gt; land so this test cleans up properly when it encounters an error.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193710" author="gerrit" created="Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:33:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bobi Jam (bobijam@hotmail.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26850&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26850&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: more debug info for hsm test_24d&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: pfl&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 2a7f9003fcb2002e3d2163e8b8e8f628491b1cec&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193861" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:45:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26877&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26877&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; test: disable sanity-hsm test 24d&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 135809281665710c5a6c32db45434c0dd8e9ba05&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="193885" author="jhammond" created="Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:15:58 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This is another instance of &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9038&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm: kernel panic in lbcfs_kkuc_group_put()&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. The CT has not registered when the request was sent, so it will take some time for the request to be reissued. In the fix from &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9038&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm: kernel panic in lbcfs_kkuc_group_put()&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9038&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9038&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/25050&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/25050&lt;/a&gt; we should also check for an empty list (since otherwise the message will be dropped):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;diff --git a/lustre/obdclass/kernelcomm.c b/lustre/obdclass/kernelcomm.c
index 0787f46..cb52660 100644
--- a/lustre/obdclass/kernelcomm.c
+++ b/lustre/obdclass/kernelcomm.c
@@ -194,6 +194,14 @@ int libcfs_kkuc_group_put(int group, void *payload)
        ENTRY;
 
        down_write(&amp;amp;kg_sem);
+
+       if (unlikely(kkuc_groups[group].next == NULL) ||
+           unlikely(OBD_FAIL_CHECK(OBD_FAIL_MDS_HSM_CT_REGISTER_NET))) {
+               /* no agent have fully registered, CDT will retry */
+               up_write(&amp;amp;kg_sem);
+               RETURN(-EAGAIN);
+       }
+
        list_for_each_entry(reg, &amp;amp;kkuc_groups[group], kr_chain) {
                if (reg-&amp;gt;kr_fp != NULL) {
                        rc = libcfs_kkuc_msg_put(reg-&amp;gt;kr_fp, payload);
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="193902" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:16:38 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26883&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26883&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; kuc: initialize kkuc_groups and module init time&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 3547e2146e14f7c112dd002694b3df3bc9d95a35&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194598" author="gerrit" created="Fri, 5 May 2017 00:42:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26883/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/26883/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9306&quot; title=&quot;sanity-hsm test 24d is failing with &amp;#39;request on 0x200000405:0x24:0x0 is not SUCCEED on mds1&amp;#39; &quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9306&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9306&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; kuc: initialize kkuc_groups at module init time&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 37bbe9a1bf33b77d3f239ea69ce052e99f09308d&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194630" author="pjones" created="Fri, 5 May 2017 03:21:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Am I right in thinking that the patch just landed to master will address the blocking aspect of this ticket and that any other work discussed will be tracked elsewhere?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194660" author="bougetq" created="Fri, 5 May 2017 13:07:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I will open a new ticket to track the work on trap registration in sanity-hsm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just from the commit messages of the other patches (&lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26877&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;disable sanity-hsm test 24d&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26850&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;more debug info for hsm test_24d&lt;/a&gt;), I don&apos;t think they are needed anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/26770/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;the patch that adds debug info&lt;/a&gt; (and was merged) should probably be reverted once we are confident enough the issue was solved. I don&apos;t know how this revert should be tracked though.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="194677" author="jhammond" created="Fri, 5 May 2017 15:10:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Peter,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Am I right in thinking that the patch just landed to master will address the blocking aspect of this ticket and that any other work discussed will be tracked elsewhere?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Correct.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzz9lr:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>