https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-956 Lustre <p>/etc/init.d/lustre of lustre-2.1 client tried to execute /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions.<br/> There is no such file in sles11sp1.</p> sles11sp1 2.6.32.23-0.3.1 LU-956

lustre-2.1 /etc/init.d/lustre failed on sles11sp1

Bug Major Closed Cannot Reproduce Zhenyu Xu Jay Lan Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:03:16 +0000 Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:30:25 +0000 Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:08:27 +0000 Lustre 2.1.0 0 2 <p>Yangsheng</p> <p>Can you plese look into this issue?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Jay,</p> <p>Can you provide the output of:</p> <p><tt># rpm -qif /etc/init.d/lustre</tt></p> <p>Hi Brian,</p> <p>node331 /etc/init.d # rpm -qif /etc/init.d/lustre<br/> Name : lustre Relocations: (not relocatable)<br/> Version : 2.1.0 Vendor: (none)<br/> Release : 1.1nasC_ofed153_2.6.32.23_0.3.1.20110428_nasa Build Date: Fri Dec 30 15:05:10 2011<br/> Install Date: Fri Dec 30 15:16:26 2011 Build Host: gulag1<br/> Group : Utilities/System Source RPM: lustre-2.1.0-1.1nasC_ofed153_2.6.32.23_0.3.1.20110428_nasa.src.rpm<br/> Size : 3923078 License: GPL<br/> Signature : (none)<br/> URL : <a href="http://wiki.whamcloud.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">http://wiki.whamcloud.com/</a><br/> Summary : Lustre File System<br/> Description :<br/> Userspace tools and files for the Lustre file system.<br/> Distribution: (none)<br/> node331 /etc/init.d # </p> <p>The git repo is available at<br/> <a href="https://github.com/jlan/lustre-nas/tree/nas-2.1.0" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://github.com/jlan/lustre-nas/tree/nas-2.1.0</a></p> <p>The change I made to the 1.1nasC vs 1nasC as in github repo was due to <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-955" title="Lustre-modules 2.1 client rpm wrongly requires lustre-backend-fs " class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-955"><del>LU-955</del></a> I filed earlier:</p> <p>diff --git a/lustre.spec.in b/lustre.spec.in<br/> index 7223a90..c515731 100644<br/> &#8212; a/lustre.spec.in<br/> +++ b/lustre.spec.in<br/> @@ <del>80,9 +80,6 @@ Requires: kernel</del>%</p> {flavor} <p> Requires: kernel = %</p> {krequires} <p> %endif<br/> %endif<br/> -%if ! %</p> {is_client} <p>-Requires: lustre-backend-fs<br/> -%endif<br/> Group: Development/Kernel</p> <p> %description modules</p> <p>Bobi</p> <p>YangSheng is rather busy atm so could you please look at this one?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Jay,</p> <p>/etc/init.d/lustre appears to have been added by 925e52c295bfe24eca431a90b65a1aba28beda8b in your github repo. That appears to be an implementation of the patch for <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-107" title="Lustre init scripts with heartbeat v1 integration" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-107"><del>LU-107</del></a>. We have not landed <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-107" title="Lustre init scripts with heartbeat v1 integration" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-107"><del>LU-107</del></a> to our tree yet so you must be getting this patch from some other source.</p> <p>Ultimately this looks like a portability bug in that patch. Probably the file it's looking for only exists on RH based systems and not SUSE systems.</p> <p>Hmm, it was cherry-picked from LLNL's 2.1 git tree at github.</p> <p>I was asked to review commits off LLNL's 2.1 git tree. That one seemed to be safe<br/> to me back then. <img class="emoticon" src="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/emoticons/sad.png" height="16" width="16" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"/><br/> Next time I will compare my version with your trees first.</p> <p>Thanks for investigation and quick reply. Please close this ticket.</p> <p>Additionally, /etc/init.d/lustre is only used on servers. Is it causing any trouble on boot of the clients? We would want to know that.</p> <p>Jay</p> <p>As I have said before, I really advise starting without any patches and only adding those you absolutely need.</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>Resolve per reporter.</p> <p>Christopher,</p> <p>Our production machines run 1.8.6 clients and 1.8.6 servers mostly. Only one Lustre FS runs 2.1. </p> <p>I was asked to set up a new test cluster to run acc-sm to test 2.1. My initial setup was 2.1 servers and 2.1 sles11sp1 clients. The 1.8.x rpms do not ship an /etc/init.d/lustre. Our site provides our own version. Without much thinking, i tried to execute /etc/init.d/lustre at sles11sp1 client and it failed at very beginning.</p> <p>I was told then to work on 2.1 servers + 1.8.6 clients as priority. I would let you know if I find more problem in sles11sp1 client when I get back to that.</p> <p>Jay</p> Development Rank 1|hzvhlj: Rank (Obsolete) 6500 Severity