https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785 Lustre <p>Hit this testing latest master out of the blue in pfl code.</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>[ 6742.349293] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity test 405: Various layout swap lock tests =================================================== 03:39:21 (1500449961) [ 6759.313039] LustreError: 3443:0:(lov_io.c:210:lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed: [ 6759.314174] LustreError: 3443:0:(lov_io.c:210:lov_io_slice_init()) LBUG [ 6759.314832] Pid: 3443, comm: kworker/u16:1 [ 6759.315510] Call Trace: [ 6759.316629] [&lt;ffffffffa01cf7ce&gt;] libcfs_call_trace+0x4e/0x60 [libcfs] [ 6759.318199] [&lt;ffffffffa01cf85c&gt;] lbug_with_loc+0x4c/0xb0 [libcfs] [ 6759.318925] [&lt;ffffffffa07a1a52&gt;] lov_io_init_composite+0x4d2/0x560 [lov] [ 6759.319495] [&lt;ffffffffa07af80e&gt;] lov_io_init+0xce/0x3e0 [lov] [ 6759.320094] [&lt;ffffffffa0389d38&gt;] cl_io_init0.isra.17+0x88/0x160 [obdclass] [ 6759.320682] [&lt;ffffffffa0389eca&gt;] cl_io_init+0x3a/0x80 [obdclass] [ 6759.321334] [&lt;ffffffffa0ddcf08&gt;] cl_sync_file_range+0x1b8/0x380 [lustre] [ 6759.322072] [&lt;ffffffffa0dfea6a&gt;] ll_writepages+0x7a/0x200 [lustre] [ 6759.322626] [&lt;ffffffff8117e8b1&gt;] do_writepages+0x21/0x50 [ 6759.323185] [&lt;ffffffff81218f50&gt;] __writeback_single_inode+0x40/0x2b0 [ 6759.323853] [&lt;ffffffff81219c11&gt;] writeback_sb_inodes+0x2b1/0x4d0 [ 6759.324401] [&lt;ffffffff81219ecf&gt;] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x9f/0xd0 [ 6759.324976] [&lt;ffffffff8121a76b&gt;] wb_writeback+0x28b/0x340 [ 6759.325714] [&lt;ffffffff8121c9cc&gt;] bdi_writeback_workfn+0x20c/0x4e0 [ 6759.326303] [&lt;ffffffff8109add6&gt;] process_one_work+0x206/0x5b0 [ 6759.326989] [&lt;ffffffff8109ad6b&gt;] ? process_one_work+0x19b/0x5b0 [ 6759.327544] [&lt;ffffffff8109b29b&gt;] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0 [ 6759.328165] [&lt;ffffffff8109b180&gt;] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x3a0 [ 6759.329849] [&lt;ffffffff810a2eda&gt;] kthread+0xea/0xf0 [ 6759.330412] [&lt;ffffffff810a2df0&gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xf0 [ 6759.332153] [&lt;ffffffff8170fbd8&gt;] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 [ 6759.332533] [&lt;ffffffff810a2df0&gt;] ? kthread+0x0/0xf0 [ 6759.332926] [ 6759.333275] Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG </pre> </div></div> <p>crashdump and modules in /exports/crashdumps/192.168.10.224-2017-07-19-03\:39\:44<br/> tag in my tree master-20170719</p> LU-9785

lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj->lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed

Bug Minor Resolved Fixed Oleg Drokin Oleg Drokin Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:53:50 +0000 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 05:33:14 +0000 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:08:42 +0000 Lustre 2.10.0 Lustre 2.11.0 Lustre 2.10.7 0 4 <p>just hit this once more on current master-next.</p> <p>Just hit this again on current master-next.</p> <p>I have seen a similar issue from FLR test and fixed it in the branch. I believe they are the same issue. Let me split the patch and push it here.</p> <p>Jinshan Xiong (jinshan.xiong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/29620" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/29620</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785" title="lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9785"><del>LU-9785</del></a> lov: take lov layout lock for I/O with ignore_layout<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 6efae413be78e3c46aca7a4c6a4cc995813bf801</p> <p>Jinshan Xiong (jinshan.xiong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/29638" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/29638</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785" title="lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9785"><del>LU-9785</del></a> lov: take lov layout lock for I/O with ignore_layout<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: flr<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 70f6175d4845a8eda6683fcc7c104be9ce5987aa</p> <p>Jinshan Xiong (jinshan.xiong@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/29638/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/29638/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785" title="lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9785"><del>LU-9785</del></a> lov: take lov layout lock for I/O with ignore_layout<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: flr<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: e43b0e5c0ccbacd8adf30713babd865b5a7c58c7</p> <p>Patch was landed to master for 2.11.0.</p> <p>Andreas Dilger (adilger@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/33965" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/33965</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785" title="lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9785"><del>LU-9785</del></a> lov: take lov layout lock for I/O with ignore_layout<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_10<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 04db28ac8434d39fa28492e1a1ba6867f7af50f1</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/33965/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/33965/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9785" title="lov_io_slice_init()) ASSERTION( obj-&gt;lo_lsm != ((void *)0) ) failed" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9785"><del>LU-9785</del></a> lov: take lov layout lock for I/O with ignore_layout<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: b2_10<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 4d8aa0ed769a233f49a641dab00452a67ef3e6ce</p> Duplicate Development Rank 1|hzzgzj: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity