https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9790 Lustre <p>This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark &lt;nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com&gt;</p> <p>This issue relates to the following test suite run: <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/02cee546-6dc5-11e7-bb38-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/02cee546-6dc5-11e7-bb38-5254006e85c2</a>.</p> <p>The sub-test test_23a failed with the following error:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>test_23a failed with 2 </pre> </div></div> <p>Please provide additional information about the failure here.</p> <p>Info required for matching: ost-pools 23a</p> <p>MDT Console Log:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>02:26:22:[10452.862564] Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl conf_param lustre.quota.ost=ug 02:26:22:[10455.041842] LustreError: 0-0: lustre-MDT0000: can't enable quota enforcement since space accounting isn't functional. Please run tunefs.lustre --quota on an unmounted filesystem if not done already </pre> </div></div> LU-9790

ost-pools test_23a: Quota failed to enable in ZFS 0.7.0-rc5

Bug Critical Resolved Duplicate Jinshan Xiong Maloo Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:13:28 +0000 Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:48:56 +0000 Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:14:47 +0000 0 5 <p>Also affecting conf-sanity/test_32b<br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c60e413e-6dd7-11e7-9a2c-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c60e413e-6dd7-11e7-9a2c-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a1f429ce-68cf-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a1f429ce-68cf-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>Jinshan</p> <p>Can you please advise on this one?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p><a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=jay" class="user-hover" rel="jay">jay</a>,</p> <p>I thought about that, but I'm seeing this on ost-pools also, not just conf-sanity.</p> <p>It turned out this is about project quota, which is supported by ZFS yet.</p> <p>Patch <a href="https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6290" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6290</a> need to be landed to ZFS then we can support it.</p> <p>We need a fix to check if ZFS supports project quota, otherwise Lustre shouldn't bother initializing it.</p> <p>The problem is this test case doesn't use project quota at all, let's investigate it further</p> <p>Other ost-pool failures by one of the ZFS 0.7.0 patches: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/22569" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/22569</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/6e0d9806-6452-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/6e0d9806-6452-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bfd472fa-637a-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bfd472fa-637a-11e7-baf7-5254006e85c2</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/31711f74-4587-11e7-b558-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/31711f74-4587-11e7-b558-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>This failure is also ZFS 0.7.0-rc2 <a href="https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-ppc/781:" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-ppc/781:</a><br/> <a href="https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/eecf38c0-457e-11e7-91f4-5254006e85c2" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/eecf38c0-457e-11e7-91f4-5254006e85c2</a></p> <p>It seems like there are some problem for quota information to transfer to OSTs. As I can see, </p> <p><tt>$LFS quota -v -u $RUNAS_ID $dir</tt></p> <p>can't sometimes get expected results.</p> <p>I'm not an expert of quota; this issue need to be fixed by somebody else.</p> <p>Niu</p> <p>Are you able to advise on this one?</p> <p>Thanks</p> <p>Peter</p> <p>This should be a regression caused by: </p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> LU-2435 osd-zfs: use zfs <span class="code-keyword">native</span> dnode accounting If ZFS userobj_accounting feature exists, use it <span class="code-keyword">for</span> osd-zfs object accounting; otherwise estimate object use by block space. Disable quota check in conf-sanity:32b and sanity-quota:7e <span class="code-keyword">if</span> the underlying zfs version is below 0.7.0. For conf-sanity test, <span class="code-keyword">if</span> the running ZFS is version 0.7.0 or higher, upgrade the zpool image to enable <span class="code-keyword">native</span> dnode accounting. That ensures we also test the upgrade procedure. </pre> </div></div> <p>Which mistakenly changed osd_acct_index_lookup() to return -ENOENT when some ID not being found in the accounting file. This regression was addressed by <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/27661/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/27661/</a> (which hasn't been landed yet).</p> <p>Thanks for the analysis Niu</p> <p>I have rebased the 0.7.0-rc5 patch on patch 27661 to see how it goes.</p> <p>AFAIK the patch Niu mentioned in <a href="https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-9790?focusedCommentId=203296&amp;page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-203296" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-9790?focusedCommentId=203296&amp;page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-203296</a> has now landed but the problem persists. What are the next steps?</p> Duplicate LU-7991 Development Rank 1|hzzh5b: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity