<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (9.4.14#940014-sha1:734e6822bbf0d45eff9af51f82432957f73aa32c) at Sat Feb 10 02:30:22 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>Whamcloud Community JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>9.4.14</version>
        <build-number>940014</build-number>
        <build-date>05-12-2023</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LU-9908] conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out</title>
                <link>https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9908</link>
                <project id="10000" key="LU">Lustre</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman &amp;lt;bob.glossman@intel.com&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This issue relates to the following test suite run: &lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c07d5048-8871-11e7-b93b-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c07d5048-8871-11e7-b93b-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The sub-test test_41b failed with the following error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;test failed to respond and timed out
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;test hangs &amp;amp; fails during client umount of lustre.  can&apos;t find root cause(s). have looked for OOPs or Panics with stack traces and can&apos;t find any.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;History search shows several similar fails on sles12sp2 recently.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Info required for matching: conf-sanity 41b&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="47939">LU-9908</key>
            <summary>conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out</summary>
                <type id="1" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=11303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                            <priority id="4" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/priorities/minor.svg">Minor</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.whamcloud.com/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="success"/>
                                    <resolution id="1">Fixed</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="ys">Yang Sheng</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="maloo">Maloo</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:20:36 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 21:41:34 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:47:55 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Lustre 2.10.1</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.11.0</fixVersion>
                    <fixVersion>Lustre 2.10.2</fixVersion>
                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                            <comments>
                            <comment id="206295" author="bogl" created="Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:31:46 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;this failure didn&apos;t reproduce on retest, so it&apos;s not a 100% fail.&lt;br/&gt;
may still be a high rate fail on sles12 though.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="206323" author="bogl" created="Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:00:06 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;fails like this are happening in more places than test 41b.&lt;br/&gt;
here&apos;s a similar looking fail in test 70e:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b3eda294-8905-11e7-b45f-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b3eda294-8905-11e7-b45f-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;once again it hangs during a client umount.&lt;br/&gt;
can&apos;t find any panic or oops on any node.&lt;br/&gt;
autotest times out an hour later and kills things.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;since conf-sanity on sles12sp2 is tested so little this failure may have been lurking for quite a long time.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="206404" author="ys" created="Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:32:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Looks like client hang:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;preformatted panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;preformattedContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;19:32:01:[15548.934823] Leftover inexact backtrace:
19:32:01:[15548.934823] 
19:32:01:[15548.934826] umount          S 0000000000000000     0 22377  22376 0x00000000
19:32:01:[15548.934827]  ffff88007ae87a78 ffff8800641a1300 ffff88007c1b5800 ffff88007ae88000
19:32:01:[15548.934828]  ffff88007ae87ab0 00000001003a2c78 ffff88007fc0e040 0000000000000000
19:32:01:[15548.934829]  ffff88007ae87a90 ffffffff815e4c45 ffff88007fc0e040 ffff88007ae87b38
19:32:01:[15548.934830] Call Trace:
19:32:01:[15548.934832]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff815e4c45&amp;gt;] schedule+0x35/0x80
19:32:01:[15548.934833]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff815e74d3&amp;gt;] schedule_timeout+0x163/0x2d0
19:32:01:[15548.934857]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0994c7b&amp;gt;] ptlrpc_set_wait+0x1cb/0x850 [ptlrpc]
19:32:01:[15548.934881]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0995378&amp;gt;] ptlrpc_queue_wait+0x78/0x210 [ptlrpc]
19:32:01:[15548.934889]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0ac851b&amp;gt;] mdc_statfs+0xab/0x2e0 [mdc]
19:32:01:[15548.934898]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa092a1ce&amp;gt;] lmv_statfs+0x26e/0xa30 [lmv]
19:32:01:[15548.934917]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0c3bbeb&amp;gt;] ll_statfs_internal+0xeb/0xe00 [lustre]
19:32:01:[15548.934929]  [&amp;lt;ffffffffa0c3c97b&amp;gt;] ll_statfs+0x7b/0x160 [lustre]
19:32:01:[15548.934932]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8122dc13&amp;gt;] statfs_by_dentry+0x93/0x110
19:32:01:[15548.934935]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8122dca6&amp;gt;] vfs_statfs+0x16/0xb0
19:32:01:[15548.934937]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8122dd80&amp;gt;] user_statfs+0x40/0x70
19:32:01:[15548.934939]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff8122ddc0&amp;gt;] SYSC_statfs+0x10/0x30
19:32:01:[15548.934941]  [&amp;lt;ffffffff815e872e&amp;gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6d
19:32:01:[15548.936314] DWARF2 unwinder stuck at entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6d
19:32:01:[15548.936314] 
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="206702" author="bogl" created="Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:24:22 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;this fail seems to be reproducing.  Here&apos;s another one:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/515eed38-8c23-11e7-b94a-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/515eed38-8c23-11e7-b94a-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</comment>
                            <comment id="206703" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:35:50 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Yang Sheng (yang.sheng@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9908&quot; title=&quot;conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9908&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9908&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: force umount client in test_70e&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 77ef8e40b0457fac025475b99fb898dd5904a2fd&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="207730" author="bogl" created="Thu, 7 Sep 2017 00:45:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8ec26fc2-935a-11e7-b74a-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8ec26fc2-935a-11e7-b74a-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208330" author="bogl" created="Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:58:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;the patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767&lt;/a&gt; changes (fixes?) test 70e, but does nothing for similar fails seen in test 41b.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&apos;s another seen on b2_10 in 41b:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/dc983726-98dd-11e7-ba20-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/dc983726-98dd-11e7-ba20-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208664" author="bogl" created="Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:29:19 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another on master:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d2071558-9ca6-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/d2071558-9ca6-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208893" author="gerrit" created="Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:38:15 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Bob Glossman (bob.glossman@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/29108&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/29108&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9908&quot; title=&quot;conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9908&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9908&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: force umount client in test_70e &amp;amp; 41b&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_10&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: 1&lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 8d3a564a82a2cdef304638b339886f2de991bdca&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="208933" author="sarah" created="Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:41:20 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;another one on b2_10 branch 2.10.1 RC1 testing with SLES12sp2 client&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/eaf41ec6-9c1f-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/eaf41ec6-9c1f-11e7-b778-5254006e85c2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211148" author="gerrit" created="Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:23:25 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/28767/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9908&quot; title=&quot;conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9908&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9908&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: force umount client in test 70e, 41b, and 105&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: master&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 20787a89ad7dc99290c4d9cff8247b0a532e92b9&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211170" author="pjones" created="Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:47:55 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Landed for 2.11&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="211868" author="gerrit" created="Tue, 24 Oct 2017 21:19:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch &lt;a href=&quot;https://review.whamcloud.com/29108/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://review.whamcloud.com/29108/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
Subject: &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9908&quot; title=&quot;conf-sanity test_41b: test failed to respond and timed out&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;LU-9908&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;LU-9908&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tests: force umount client in test 70e, 41b, and 105&lt;br/&gt;
Project: fs/lustre-release&lt;br/&gt;
Branch: b2_10&lt;br/&gt;
Current Patch Set: &lt;br/&gt;
Commit: 1361b447bb68757f6f41ce7d5cbec954c727c31d&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10120">
                    <name>Blocker</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="is blocking">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="45935">LU-9469</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10890" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10390" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>1|hzzixr:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10090" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-global-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank (Obsolete)</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>9223372036854775807</customfieldvalue>
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10060" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Severity</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10022"><![CDATA[3]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>