https://jira.whamcloud.com This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 9.4.14 940014 05-12-2023 https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9995 Lustre <p>The latest lustre code (New tag 2.10.53) commit 57fccbb3 is causing the following lbuild error:<br/> <a href="https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-reviews/50400/arch=x86_64,build_type=server,distro=el7,ib_stack=inkernel/console" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/lustre-reviews/50400/arch=x86_64,build_type=server,distro=el7,ib_stack=inkernel/console</a></p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>/tmp/rpmbuild-lustre-buildbot-Wi8EL9Vz/BUILD/lustre-2.10.53_1_g63b8101/lustre/lfsck/lfsck_striped_dir.c: In function 'lfsck_read_stripe_lmv': /tmp/rpmbuild-lustre-buildbot-Wi8EL9Vz/BUILD/lustre-2.10.53_1_g63b8101/lustre/lfsck/lfsck_striped_dir.c:855: error: 'LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD' undeclared (first use in this function) /tmp/rpmbuild-lustre-buildbot-Wi8EL9Vz/BUILD/lustre-2.10.53_1_g63b8101/lustre/lfsck/lfsck_striped_dir.c:855: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /tmp/rpmbuild-lustre-buildbot-Wi8EL9Vz/BUILD/lustre-2.10.53_1_g63b8101/lustre/lfsck/lfsck_striped_dir.c:855: error: for each function it appears in.) </pre> </div></div> <p>Seems related to this definition:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>#if LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE &lt; OBD_OCD_VERSION(2, 10, 53, 0) /* Since lustre 2.8, this flag will not be needed, instead this DEAD * and orphan flags will be stored in LMA (see LMAI_ORPHAN) * Keep this flag just for LFSCK, because it still might meet such flag when it checks the old FS / #define LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD 0x40000000 #endif </pre> </div></div> LU-9995

lbuild error: 'LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD' undeclared (first use in this function)

Bug Blocker Resolved Fixed nasf Emoly Liu Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:06:13 +0000 Mon, 9 Oct 2017 04:02:56 +0000 Mon, 9 Oct 2017 04:02:56 +0000 Lustre 2.11.0 0 5 <p>I pushed the check to take effect in 2.10.56, but we need to fix it by then.</p> <p>I guess Fan Yong would be a good person to loook at this since the only remaining users are in lfsck?</p> <p>Agreed. Fan Yong could you please advise on this?</p> <p>Fan Yong (fan.yong@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/29130" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/29130</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9995" title="lbuild error: &#39;LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD&#39; undeclared (first use in this function)" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9995"><del>LU-9995</del></a> lfsck: keep the LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD flag<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: 1<br/> Commit: 527b9edd6b043778a3c586ee10d5cc0e71cf93ca</p> <p>Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch <a href="https://review.whamcloud.com/29130/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://review.whamcloud.com/29130/</a><br/> Subject: <a href="https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9995" title="lbuild error: &#39;LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD&#39; undeclared (first use in this function)" class="issue-link" data-issue-key="LU-9995"><del>LU-9995</del></a> lfsck: keep the LMV_HASH_FLAG_DEAD flag<br/> Project: fs/lustre-release<br/> Branch: master<br/> Current Patch Set: <br/> Commit: 51f4abfa40c0f47453a592a92185c17daae87bd8</p> Development Rank 1|hzzk9j: Rank (Obsolete) 9223372036854775807 Severity