Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Minor
-
None
-
Lustre 2.1.0, Lustre 2.2.0
-
e2fsprogs-1.41.90.wc4 development release
-
3
-
3
-
6482
Description
It appears that Lustre is creating somewhat invalid files on the OST:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/cbcbbd2e-3f50-11e1-990e-5254004bbbd3
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1402: increase inode 20 badness 0 to 1
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1406: increase inode 20 badness 1 to 3
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1402: increase inode 31 badness 0 to 1
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1406: increase inode 31 badness 1 to 3
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1402: increase inode 32 badness 0 to 1
09:47:21:fat-intel-1vm4: e2fsck_pass1:1406: increase inode 32 badness 1 to 3
These messages relate to the checks added in the "e2fsprogs-ibadness-counter" patch:
if (EXT4_XTIME_FUTURE(ctx, sb, inode->i_atime,ctx->time_fudge)||
EXT4_XTIME_FUTURE(ctx, sb, inode->i_mtime,ctx->time_fudge))
e2fsck_mark_inode_bad(ctx, ino, BADNESS_NORMAL);+
if (EXT4_XTIME_FUTURE(ctx, sb, inode->i_ctime,ctx->time_fudge)||
EXT4_XTIME_ANCIENT(ctx, sb, inode->i_ctime,ctx->time_fudge))
e2fsck_mark_inode_bad(ctx, ino, BADNESS_HIGH);
In turn I think this is caused by the code in filter_create:
/* Set a/c/m time to a insane large negative value at creation * time so that any timestamp arriving from the client will * always be newer and update the inode. * See LU-221 for details */ iattr.ia_valid = ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME; LTIME_S(iattr.ia_atime) = INT_MIN + 24 * 3600; LTIME_S(iattr.ia_mtime) = INT_MIN + 24 * 3600; LTIME_S(iattr.ia_ctime) = INT_MIN + 24 * 3600;
This was added in commit 414251797ed178eec5d431e1f5aa4a889d2b159f, which "git describe" shows as 2_0_66_0-3-g4142517
This isn't a critical issue in itself, but it means that unused OST files are 3/8 of the way to being marked invalid, and other normal causes like objects over 2GB will also help push the inodes closer to the edge.
Attachments
Issue Links
- duplicates
-
LU-1042 1.8 clients show wrong dates with 2.1 servers
- Resolved