Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-10215

disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 is not packaged into test rpm

Details

    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 not included in th RPM means it's not really being tested in maloo.

      And of course since it's not being tested, nobody knows it actually fails in conf-sanity test 32b too.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-10215] disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 is not packaged into test rpm

            "Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/55444/
            Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_15
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 4cdd62f21a6c56dd73673fb80724f85a3221661a

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - "Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/55444/ Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_15 Current Patch Set: Commit: 4cdd62f21a6c56dd73673fb80724f85a3221661a

            "Li Dongyang <dongyangli@ddn.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/55444
            Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_15
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 25010dd945284a47cb9a15e6488ce59d6b6f8a70

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - "Li Dongyang <dongyangli@ddn.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/55444 Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_15 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 25010dd945284a47cb9a15e6488ce59d6b6f8a70

            "Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/47281/
            Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: add70ce9cdc3e2d6148dafeef587d12d0277744c

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - "Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>" merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/47281/ Subject: LU-10215 tests: remove disk2_4 disk2_5 images Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: add70ce9cdc3e2d6148dafeef587d12d0277744c

            "Wei Liu <sarah@whamcloud.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/47281
            Subject: LU-10215 tests: Add disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 into Makefile
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: bd03b6109abbb630b5d73ec6561f428c4723ce76

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - "Wei Liu <sarah@whamcloud.com>" uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/47281 Subject: LU-10215 tests: Add disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 into Makefile Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: bd03b6109abbb630b5d73ec6561f428c4723ce76

            Assign to Sarah as discussed in the patch.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Assign to Sarah as discussed in the patch.
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

            Hm, looks like symlinks processing have changed? The image before and after upgrade has different symlink inode numbers, only symlinks appear to be affected

             -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0  2261 1282455365 oddjobd
             -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0  2262 1270025191 rsyslog
             -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0  2296 1289554952 udev-post
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956452 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956455 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956452 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956455 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956510 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956513 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956510 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
            +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956513 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests
             -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0  2442 1289551139 lvm2-monitor
             -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0  2515 1289565046 nscd
             -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0  2521 1289557304 sssd
            

            Any ideas?

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - Hm, looks like symlinks processing have changed? The image before and after upgrade has different symlink inode numbers, only symlinks appear to be affected -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2261 1282455365 oddjobd -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2262 1270025191 rsyslog -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2296 1289554952 udev-post -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956452 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956453 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956454 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956455 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956452 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956453 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956454 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956455 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956510 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956511 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 K99microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956512 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 23 1433956513 S00microcode_ctl -> ../init.d/microcode_ctl +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956510 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956511 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 K02libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956512 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests +lrwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 24 1433956513 S98libvirt-guests -> ../init.d/libvirt-guests -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2442 1289551139 lvm2-monitor -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2515 1289565046 nscd -rwxr-xr-x 1 0 0 2521 1289557304 sssd Any ideas?
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - - edited

            The failute was basically this:

            DIFF OUTPUT where only fids changed
            conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: list verification failed
            conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_32b failed with 1
            
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - - edited The failute was basically this: DIFF OUTPUT where only fids changed conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: list verification failed conf-sanity test_32b: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_32b failed with 1
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

            I totally expect this patch to fail - in the debug output we can see the fids changed so probably it was generated on a 32bit system and wrongly marked as 64bit?

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - I totally expect this patch to fail - in the debug output we can see the fids changed so probably it was generated on a 32bit system and wrongly marked as 64bit?
            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - - edited

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30002
            Subject: LU-10215 tests: Package disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 into tests rpm
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: c99a3912914652ed72abe36aa7b08af86b646e15

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - - edited Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30002 Subject: LU-10215 tests: Package disk2_5-ldiskfs.tar.bz2 into tests rpm Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: c99a3912914652ed72abe36aa7b08af86b646e15

            People

              sarah Sarah Liu
              green Oleg Drokin
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: