Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-10505

sanity test_56w: '/usr/bin/lfs getstripe -c /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1 wrong: found 7, expected 6

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.11.0
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      sanity test_56w - /usr/bin/lfs getstripe -c /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1 wrong: found 7, expected 6
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ DO NOT REMOVE LINE ABOVE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

      This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run:

      test_56w failed with the following error:

      /usr/bin/lfs getstripe -c /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1 wrong: found 7, expected 6
      

      https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8711735c-f739-11e7-a6ad-52540065bddc

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-10505] sanity test_56w: '/usr/bin/lfs getstripe -c /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1 wrong: found 7, expected 6

          Minh Diep (minh.diep@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31093
          Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax
          Project: fs/lustre-release
          Branch: b2_10
          Current Patch Set: 1
          Commit: f3c524bc777293c948de9288f111ced9494200b2

          gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Minh Diep (minh.diep@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31093 Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_10 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: f3c524bc777293c948de9288f111ced9494200b2
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Landed for 2.11

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.11

          Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/30860/
          Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax
          Project: fs/lustre-release
          Branch: master
          Current Patch Set:
          Commit: 1bbd4f4bbe7bd98b7624d8757f3f775e81e9b994

          gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/30860/ Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 1bbd4f4bbe7bd98b7624d8757f3f775e81e9b994

          Bob Glossman (bob.glossman@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30860
          Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax
          Project: fs/lustre-release
          Branch: master
          Current Patch Set: 1
          Commit: fb383670d39d7e43ca1a0e6b44cc182f3784e04a

          gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Bob Glossman (bob.glossman@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/30860 Subject: LU-10505 scripts: avoid version dependent shell script syntax Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: fb383670d39d7e43ca1a0e6b44cc182f3784e04a

          Peter,
          Happy to try out a possible fix. what is the patch?

          Bob

          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - Peter, Happy to try out a possible fix. what is the patch? Bob
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Bob

          RHEL 6.x is no longer officially supported on master but I think that some people still find it useful. Discussion on the triage call today suggested it should be fairly straightforward to add an additional patch to get this working for RHEL 6. 

          Can you give it a try?

          Thanks

          Peter

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Bob RHEL 6.x is no longer officially supported on master but I think that some people still find it useful. Discussion on the triage call today suggested it should be fairly straightforward to add an additional patch to get this working for RHEL 6.  Can you give it a try? Thanks Peter
          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          errors like this seen on test log:

          /usr/bin/lfs_migrate -y -c 6 /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1
          /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 150: OPTS: bad array subscript
          /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 152: OPTS: bad array subscript
          /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 154: OPTS: bad array subscript
          /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1: done migrate
          

          Suggests problems with the lfs_migrate script, or calls to it in sanity tests.

          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited errors like this seen on test log: /usr/bin/lfs_migrate -y -c 6 /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1 /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 150: OPTS: bad array subscript /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 152: OPTS: bad array subscript /usr/bin/lfs_migrate: line 154: OPTS: bad array subscript /mnt/lustre/d56w.sanityw/file1: done migrate Suggests problems with the lfs_migrate script, or calls to it in sanity tests.
          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          suspect this problem may have been introduced in the very recent landing on master:

          commit 60c5bc2502591f46260e11db540c0ec2adbc8db8
          LU-8235 scripts: pass unrecognized options to lfs migrate

          I note that this made major changes to the lfs_migrate script.
          I speculate these changes may not function correctly on el6.

          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - - edited suspect this problem may have been introduced in the very recent landing on master: commit 60c5bc2502591f46260e11db540c0ec2adbc8db8 LU-8235 scripts: pass unrecognized options to lfs migrate I note that this made major changes to the lfs_migrate script. I speculate these changes may not function correctly on el6.
          bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - another on master: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/cc76b10c-f7b9-11e7-a7cd-52540065bddc

          People

            bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive)
            maloo Maloo
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: