Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-12068

sanity-lfsck test_6b: (7.2) 0x0 is not larger than 0x0

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Major
    • Lustre 2.13.0, Lustre 2.12.2
    • Lustre 2.13.0, Lustre 2.12.1
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for wangshilong <wshilong@ddn.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/36dcb5b6-45d2-11e9-9646-52540065bddc

      test_6b failed with the following error:

      (7.2) 0x0 is not larger than 0x0
      

      <<Please provide additional information about the failure here>>

      VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV
      sanity-lfsck test_6b - (7.2) 0x0 is not larger than 0x0

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-12068] sanity-lfsck test_6b: (7.2) 0x0 is not larger than 0x0

            Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34696/
            Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_12
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 1e6cd6b21fc37420341fdb0dcec366bb3feb350e

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34696/ Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_12 Current Patch Set: Commit: 1e6cd6b21fc37420341fdb0dcec366bb3feb350e

            Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34695/
            Subject: LU-12068 tests: add debug for sanity-lfsck test_6b
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_12
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: f5e0c311ae60709070514b951f7d25d537d3dc91

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34695/ Subject: LU-12068 tests: add debug for sanity-lfsck test_6b Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_12 Current Patch Set: Commit: f5e0c311ae60709070514b951f7d25d537d3dc91

            Minh Diep (mdiep@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34696
            Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_12
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 08a0fa85c6f9987dbd6c3049b46c660a1846a1c3

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Minh Diep (mdiep@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34696 Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_12 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 08a0fa85c6f9987dbd6c3049b46c660a1846a1c3

            Minh Diep (mdiep@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34695
            Subject: LU-12068 tests: add debug for sanity-lfsck test_6b
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_12
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 02ebeedf6dcd83d11e13e31c06753cfaef5dcbbf

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Minh Diep (mdiep@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/34695 Subject: LU-12068 tests: add debug for sanity-lfsck test_6b Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_12 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 02ebeedf6dcd83d11e13e31c06753cfaef5dcbbf
            mdiep Minh Diep added a comment -

            Landed in 2.13

            mdiep Minh Diep added a comment - Landed in 2.13

            Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34525/
            Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 42adbae36f206a6ed4170e7619cd993c8fa80b1d

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (green@whamcloud.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34525/ Subject: LU-12068 test: compare position for ZFS dot entry Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 42adbae36f206a6ed4170e7619cd993c8fa80b1d
            mdiep Minh Diep added a comment - +1 on b2_12 https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/eb96e502-5523-11e9-9646-52540065bddc
            hongchao.zhang Hongchao Zhang added a comment - - edited

            Hi Andreas,

            Yes, there is one failed case on 2019-02-20 and another one on 2019-02-25, both failed cases are on branch "master-next",
            the version is "2.12.51.85", is it possible this version contains some other patches?

            https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/ae657cad-8359-4ff5-a42a-9b0e496a025b
            https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/b49849ff-483d-4982-84c5-92721cae1afe

            hongchao.zhang Hongchao Zhang added a comment - - edited Hi Andreas, Yes, there is one failed case on 2019-02-20 and another one on 2019-02-25, both failed cases are on branch "master-next", the version is "2.12.51.85", is it possible this version contains some other patches? https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/ae657cad-8359-4ff5-a42a-9b0e496a025b https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/b49849ff-483d-4982-84c5-92721cae1afe

            The patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34098 "LU-11330 osd-zfs: hash for ./.. must be 0" only landed on 2019-02-27, while there were a few tests failing on 2019-02-20 to 2019-02-25, so it is close to the first date this problem was seen, but not exactly the same. However, most of the tests started failing after 2019-02-27 so it is possible there are a couple of different issues here, and LU-11330 made the problem much worse. There aren't any cases where this test failed during the testing of LU-11330, but it is definitely not being hit on ldiskfs so this is the likely cause of most of these failures.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - The patch https://review.whamcloud.com/34098 " LU-11330 osd-zfs: hash for ./.. must be 0 " only landed on 2019-02-27, while there were a few tests failing on 2019-02-20 to 2019-02-25, so it is close to the first date this problem was seen, but not exactly the same. However, most of the tests started failing after 2019-02-27 so it is possible there are a couple of different issues here, and LU-11330 made the problem much worse. There aren't any cases where this test failed during the testing of LU-11330 , but it is definitely not being hit on ldiskfs so this is the likely cause of most of these failures.

            People

              hongchao.zhang Hongchao Zhang
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: