Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Not a Bug
-
Minor
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
3
-
9223372036854775807
Description
this is a reply to a recovery ping:
00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.584402:0:1949:0:(lib-move.c:3854:lnet_mt_event_handler()) Received event: 5 status: 0 00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.584404:0:1949:0:(lib-move.c:3869:lnet_mt_event_handler()) 192.168.2.35@tcp1 recovery message sent successfully:0 00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.585814:0:1949:0:(lib-move.c:4434:lnet_parse()) TRACE: 192.168.2.39@tcp2(192.168.2.39@tcp2) <- 192.168.2.35@tcp1 : REPLY - for me 00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.585821:0:1949:0:(lib-move.c:4199:lnet_parse_reply()) 192.168.2.39@tcp2: Reply from 12345-192.168.2.35@tcp1 of length 64/64 into md 0x25 00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.585827:0:1949:0:(lib-msg.c:1062:lnet_is_health_check()) health check = 1, status = 0, hstatus = 0 00000400:00000200:0.0:1628809321.585830:0:1949:0:(lib-msg.c:836:lnet_health_check()) health check: 192.168.2.39@tcp2->192.168.2.33@tcp2: REPLY: OK
Note, the reply is from 192.168.2.35@tcp1, but lnet_health_check is looking at the router NID that forwarded the message, 192.168.2.33@tcp2.