Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-16395

obdfilter-survey: Error: 'Timeout occurred after 342 minutes, last suite running was obdfilter-survey'

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • Lustre 2.15.1
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Minh Diep <mdiep@whamcloud.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/44907b48-6f5c-466e-afa5-37c6c1e29571

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-16395] obdfilter-survey: Error: 'Timeout occurred after 342 minutes, last suite running was obdfilter-survey'
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Here is the back-ported patch for b2_15 branch: https://review.whamcloud.com/49413

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Here is the back-ported patch for b2_15 branch: https://review.whamcloud.com/49413
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Yes, Peter, there are 13 patches for that ticket. I'm looking at them to see if I can just port #47239.

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Yes, Peter, there are 13 patches for that ticket. I'm looking at them to see if I can just port #47239.
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Ah very good - thanks. So it would probably make sense to port that same patch to b2_15 to reduce test noise?

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Ah very good - thanks. So it would probably make sense to port that same patch to b2_15 to reduce test noise?
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            The same test was removed from master branch by https://review.whamcloud.com/47239 ("LU-10994 test: remove netdisk from obdfilter-survey").

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - The same test was removed from master branch by https://review.whamcloud.com/47239 (" LU-10994 test: remove netdisk from obdfilter-survey").
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            Hi Peter,
            It's not a regression in 2.15.2.

            The same failure occurred on:
            2.15.0: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a17b3fbf-ece1-4554-9cb1-02f25578424e
            2.15.1: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ae959a93-3db7-47d4-94d5-126e8c65a13e

            All of the failure instances are in full-zfs-part-1 and full-dne-zfs-part-1 test sessions.
            The same test passed in full-part-1 and full-dne-part-1 test sessions with ldiskfs.

             

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Hi Peter, It's not a regression in 2.15.2. The same failure occurred on: 2.15.0: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a17b3fbf-ece1-4554-9cb1-02f25578424e 2.15.1: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ae959a93-3db7-47d4-94d5-126e8c65a13e All of the failure instances are in full-zfs-part-1 and full-dne-zfs-part-1 test sessions. The same test passed in full-part-1 and full-dne-part-1 test sessions with ldiskfs.  
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Jian

            Could you please check to see whether this is indicative of a regression in 2.15.2?

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Jian Could you please check to see whether this is indicative of a regression in 2.15.2? Peter

            People

              yujian Jian Yu
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: