Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-1673

Locking issue with 1.8.x clients talking to 2.2 Servers

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Critical
    • None
    • Lustre 2.2.0
    • client 1.8.x server 2.2

    Description

      We noticed that clients running Lustre 1.8.x seem to have trouble locking files hosted on 2.2 Servers.

      Attachments

        Activity

          [LU-1673] Locking issue with 1.8.x clients talking to 2.2 Servers
          ys Yang Sheng added a comment -

          As Lurii commented in gerrit:

          Iurii Golovach		Nov 2
          
          Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn't submit this
          
          This patch looks obsolete since there are already number of patches which cover this issue:
          
          http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3722 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3202 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3203 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3725 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3727
          

          So close this bug.

          ys Yang Sheng added a comment - As Lurii commented in gerrit: Iurii Golovach Nov 2 Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn't submit this This patch looks obsolete since there are already number of patches which cover this issue: http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3722 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3202 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3203 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3725 http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3727 So close this bug.
          green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

          James, like you correctly mention, that change is only needed for 2.3 interop which is not the case here, so there is no rush to get it included, esp. since there is no official 2.3 release and won't be for some time.

          You can get RPMs here: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/7975/arch=x86_64,build_type=server,distro=el6,ib_stack=inkernel/artifact/artifacts/RPMS/

          green Oleg Drokin added a comment - James, like you correctly mention, that change is only needed for 2.3 interop which is not the case here, so there is no rush to get it included, esp. since there is no official 2.3 release and won't be for some time. You can get RPMs here: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/7975/arch=x86_64,build_type=server,distro=el6,ib_stack=inkernel/artifact/artifacts/RPMS/
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3486

          Don't forget the patch for http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3008 as well since it is need to 2.3 <-> 2.2 interop testing,

          simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - Don't forget the patch for http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,3008 as well since it is need to 2.3 <-> 2.2 interop testing,
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Yangsheng is working on creating patched RPMs

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Yangsheng is working on creating patched RPMs

          Could you provide us patched rpms?

          Thanks in advance

          ethz.support ETHz Support (Inactive) added a comment - Could you provide us patched rpms? Thanks in advance
          green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

          flocks are only taken on MDS, so updating just MDS is fine.

          green Oleg Drokin added a comment - flocks are only taken on MDS, so updating just MDS is fine.

          Would we have to patch only the MDS or also all OSTs?
          Upgrading all OSTs requires quite some downtime :-/

          Could you provide us the rpms patched for 2.2 servers?

          Thanks in advance.

          ethz.support ETHz Support (Inactive) added a comment - Would we have to patch only the MDS or also all OSTs? Upgrading all OSTs requires quite some downtime :-/ Could you provide us the rpms patched for 2.2 servers? Thanks in advance.
          green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

          Hm, I was under impression that the fix for this landed in time for 2.2, but alas.

          The patch that fixes this could be found here: http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2193

          green Oleg Drokin added a comment - Hm, I was under impression that the fix for this landed in time for 2.2, but alas. The patch that fixes this could be found here: http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2193
          pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

          Oleg is look into this one

          pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Oleg is look into this one

          People

            ys Yang Sheng
            ethz.support ETHz Support (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: