Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-17066

lod_xattr_set()) ASSERTION( (!!(!strcmp(name, "lustre.""lov") || !strcmp(name, "trusted.lov")) == !!(!lod_dt_obj(dt)->ldo_comp_cached)) ) failed

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Critical
    • None
    • Lustre 2.16.0
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      Adding additional racer test https://review.whamcloud.com/c/fs/lustre-release/+/41368 surfaced the following crash:

      [16104.408588] LustreError: 4168:0:(lod_object.c:5136:lod_xattr_set()) ASSERTION( (!!(!strcmp(name, "lustre.""lov") || !strcmp(name, "trusted.lov")) == !!(!lod_dt_obj(dt)->ldo_comp_cached)) ) failed: 
      [16104.411561] LustreError: 4168:0:(lod_object.c:5136:lod_xattr_set()) LBUG
      [16104.412125] Pid: 4168, comm: mdt_rdpg01_003 3.10.0-7.9-debug #2 SMP Tue Feb 1 18:17:58 EST 2022
      [16104.413146] Call Trace:
      [16104.413633] [<0>] libcfs_call_trace+0x90/0xf0 [libcfs]
      [16104.414162] [<0>] lbug_with_loc+0x4c/0xa0 [libcfs]
      [16104.414692] [<0>] lod_xattr_set+0x1b13/0x1c90 [lod]
      [16104.415221] [<0>] mdo_xattr_set+0xc0/0x4c0 [mdd]
      [16104.415746] [<0>] mdd_xattr_set+0xf85/0x1200 [mdd]
      [16104.416279] [<0>] mo_xattr_set+0x43/0x45 [mdt]
      [16104.416812] [<0>] mdt_close_handle_layouts+0x9a4/0xee0 [mdt]
      [16104.417358] [<0>] mdt_mfd_close+0x5b2/0xbb0 [mdt]
      [16104.417887] [<0>] mdt_close_internal+0xb4/0x240 [mdt]
      [16104.418532] [<0>] mdt_close+0x28c/0x970 [mdt]
      [16104.419217] [<0>] tgt_request_handle+0x88e/0x19b0 [ptlrpc]
      [16104.419815] [<0>] ptlrpc_server_handle_request+0x251/0xc00 [ptlrpc]
      [16104.420555] [<0>] ptlrpc_main+0xc66/0x1670 [ptlrpc]
      [16104.421185] [<0>] kthread+0xe4/0xf0
      [16104.422327] [<0>] ret_from_fork_nospec_begin+0x7/0x21
      [16104.422934] [<0>] 0xfffffffffffffffe
      [16104.423456] Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG

      Crashdump: http://testing.linuxhacker.ru/lustre-reports/external/crashes/boilpot-bigmem-65-2023-08-25-15:53:21/

      Intresting that the same assertion in the same place was previously seen mid-2021 as part of https://review.whamcloud.com/44178 testing in sanity-flr and hot-pool tests: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/de728c9c-b9dd-4c65-b898-507df9215560

      Here's the tracker for this crash that lists all matching failures: https://knox.linuxhacker.ru/crashdb_ui_external.py.cgi?newid=6580

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              bzzz Alex Zhuravlev
              green Oleg Drokin
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: