[LU-17168] sanity test_119f: dio copy failed

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Unresolved
• Priority: Critical
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.17.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Shaun Tancheff
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for S Buisson <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/0cb84aba-ae98-42a6-ae2a-2b75af464c12

test_119f failed with the following error:

dio copy 2 w/bsize 1044480 failed: 1

Test session details:
clients: https://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/99093 - 4.18.0-477.21.1.el8_8.x86_64
servers: https://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/99093 - 4.18.0-477.21.1.el8_lustre.x86_64

Test logs shows:

bs: 1044480
dd: fsync failed for '/mnt/lustre/f119f.sanity.2': Input/output error
12+1 records in
12+1 records out
26214400 bytes (26 MB, 25 MiB) copied, 3.17658 s, 8.3 MB/s
25+1 records in
25+1 records out
26214400 bytes (26 MB, 25 MiB) copied, 4.27577 s, 6.1 MB/s
 sanity test_119f: @@@@@@ FAIL: dio copy 2 w/bsize 1044480 failed: 1 

VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV
sanity test_119f - dio copy 2 w/bsize 1044480 failed: 1

Issue Links

• is related to: LU-17597 interop: master/2.15/2.14/2.12 sanity test_56x: migrate failed rc = 22
• is related to: LU-17525 Unaligned DIO interop with different page sizes fails
• is related to: LU-17927 sanity test_119e: FAIL: trivial unaligned dio failed

Comments

[Peter Jones]

As per discussion on the LWG call today, moving tickets that do not appear to be essential to fix version 2.17. If the fix lands before code freeze we will update the fix version to reflect that but we want to focus on activities on the critical path. Please speak up if you think that this issue definitely needs to be fixed before we could issue a 2.16 release.

[Patrick Farrell (Inactive)]

Shaun,

Since you debugged those, are you able to take a look here?

[Andreas Dilger]

Shaun, Patrick, any further thoughts on this issue?

There are quite a number of different test failures related to UDIO changes on master, and I'm not keen on landing more of the HIO patches until the stability of the existing code is improved, particularly as we are trying to wind up the 2.16 release.

[Patrick Farrell (Inactive)]

I will defer to Shaun for initial analysis, but if it turns out not to be a duplicate I can help dig on it.

[Peter Jones]

Shaun

Is this a duplicate of LU-17927?

Peter

[Andreas Dilger]

stancheff, paf, is this a duplicate of LU-17927 and LU-17525, and will be fixed by the UDIO patches already in flight?