Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Minor
-
None
-
Lustre 1.8.8
-
None
-
3
-
6349
Description
Sanger has hit an LBUG on its clients:
ASSERTION(atomic_read(&import->imp_refcount) < 0x5a5a5a) failed
This appears to be a dupe of LU-919, but that patch was never landed on b1_8, though the patch was created. Is there any chance to get it landed? It failed the maloo test, but it doesn't look like that failure was investigated:
http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,1954
Attachments
Issue Links
- duplicates
-
LU-919 Multiple wrong LBUGs checking cfs_atomic_t vars/fields with inacurate poison value of 0x5a5a5a
- Resolved
- Trackbacks
-
Lustre 1.8.x known issues tracker While testing against Lustre b18 branch, we would hit known bugs which were already reported in Lustre Bugzilla https://bugzilla.lustre.org/. In order to move away from relying on Bugzilla, we would create a JIRA