Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-18336

interop: conf-sanity test_30a: FAIL: Deleted value=64 -ne orig=61

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.17.0
    • Lustre 2.16.0, Lustre 2.15.6
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for jianyu <yujian@whamcloud.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/31e964e5-1404-4a3c-b868-30ad5dd3fcc6

      test_30a failed with the following error:

      mount lustre  on /mnt/lustre.....
      Starting client: trevis-81vm1.trevis.whamcloud.com:  -o user_xattr,flock 10.240.42.201@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
      CMD: trevis-81vm1.trevis.whamcloud.com mkdir -p /mnt/lustre
      CMD: trevis-81vm1.trevis.whamcloud.com mount -t lustre -o user_xattr,flock 10.240.42.201@tcp:/lustre /mnt/lustre
      deleted (default) value=64, orig=61
       conf-sanity test_30a: @@@@@@ FAIL: Deleted value=64 -ne orig=61 
      

      Test session details:
      clients: https://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-master/4581 - 4.18.0-553.16.1.el8_10.x86_64
      servers: https://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_15/94 - 4.18.0-553.5.1.el8_lustre.x86_64

      <<Please provide additional information about the failure here>>

      VVVVVVV DO NOT REMOVE LINES BELOW, Added by Maloo for auto-association VVVVVVV
      conf-sanity test_30a - Deleted value=64 -ne orig=61

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-18336] interop: conf-sanity test_30a: FAIL: Deleted value=64 -ne orig=61
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre 2.16.0 RC5 client with 2.15.5 server: https://testing.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bf51531-c7ba-462d-aecb-d01083f98aba
            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment -

            This is an old issue, more than 2.5 years. I suspect it is related to the previous test case failure.

            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment - This is an old issue, more than 2.5 years. I suspect it is related to the previous test case failure.
            lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment -

            emoly.liu Would you please take a look?

            lixi_wc Li Xi added a comment - emoly.liu Would you please take a look?
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            The failure occurred consistently in the following 2.16.0 clients with 2.15.5 servers interop test sessions:
            lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_full-dne-part-3
            lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_el9.4-x86_64_full-dne-part-3
            lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_sles15sp6-x86_64_full-dne-part-3
            lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_ubuntu2404-x86_64_full-dne-part-3

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - The failure occurred consistently in the following 2.16.0 clients with 2.15.5 servers interop test sessions: lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_full-dne-part-3 lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_el9.4-x86_64_full-dne-part-3 lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_sles15sp6-x86_64_full-dne-part-3 lustre-reviews_el8.10-x86_64_ubuntu2404-x86_64_full-dne-part-3

            People

              emoly.liu Emoly Liu
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: