[LU-1912] Test failure on test suite lfsck

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Blocker
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.4.0
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.2.0, Lustre 2.3.0, Lustre 2.4.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Jian Yu
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for Minh Diep <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/0e62c5d6-fa97-11e1-887d-52540035b04c.

survey:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils/gss:/usr/lib64/lustre/utils:/usr/lib64/openmpi/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin: NAME=autotest_config sh rpc.sh check_logdir /home/autotest/.autotest/shared_dir/2012-09-08/054638-7fbcd5d87e28
lfsck : @@@@@@ FAIL: /home/autotest/.autotest/shared_dir/2012-09-08/054638-7fbcd5d87e28 isn't a shared directory
Trace dump:
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:3642:error_noexit()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:3664:error()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/test-framework.sh:3219:generate_db()
= /usr/lib64/lustre/tests/lfsck.sh:260:main()

It's strange to me the different lustre version (b2_2 and b2_3) between server and client would cause above issue. I tried on a cluster with all b2_3 and it worked for the exact some dir (ie /scratch/mdiep/tmp)

Comments

[Peter Jones]

Landed for 2.3 and 2.4

[Jian Yu]

Patch for master branch: http://review.whamcloud.com/4021
It also needs to be cherry-picked to b2_3 branch.

[Jian Yu]

Lustre client build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_2/17
Lustre server build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_3/19
Distro/Arch: RHEL6.3/x86_64
The same issue occurred: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/d84f0c0e-ff5d-11e1-bce0-52540035b04c

[Jian Yu]

Hi Peter,
For 2.3 client and 2.2 server, we can add Lustre version check code in 2.3 test suite to skip the test.
For 2.2 client and 2.3 server, I think there is no proper way.

[Minh Diep]

If approve, I think we can check and skip server or client run b2_2 or b2_3

[Peter Jones]

Yujian

We don't have any plans to land anything to b2_2 at this time. Is there a way to just skip this test when interoperating with 2.2? If not then this test failure will disappear when we switching to the 2.4 interop matrix.

Peter

[Jian Yu]

The patch for LU-1255 in http://review.whamcloud.com/#change,2376 needs to be landed on Lustre b2_2 branch.

[Peter Jones]

Yujian

Could you please look into this one?

Thanks

Peter

[Minh Diep]

on b2_3

check_write_access() {
local dir=$1
local node
local file

for node in $(nodes_list); do
file=$dir/check_file.$(short_hostname $node)
if [[ ! -f "$file" ]]; then

1. Logdir not accessible/writable from this node.
   return 1
   fi
   rm -f $file || return 1
   done
   return 0
   }

on b2_2

check_write_access() {
local dir=$1
for node in $(nodes_list); do
if [ ! -f "$dir/node.$(short_hostname ${node}).yml" ]; then

1. Logdir not accessible/writable from this node.
   return 1
   fi
   done
   rm -f $dir/node.*.yml
   return 0
   }

This means running b2_3 <-> b2_2 will cause this issue because the file created and expected to exist will be different. I don't have a good solution for this. Let's check with Yujian