[LU-2285] Test failure on replay-ost-single test_3: write page inode failed -2

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
• Priority: Major
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.4.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Li Wei (Inactive)
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for Oleg Drokin <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/70b83f68-2797-11e2-9e20-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_3 failed with the following error:

test_3 failed with 1

on client we can see in dmesg that the write actually failed.

Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark == replay-ost-single test 3: Fail OST during write, with verification ================================ 12:42:29 \(1352148149\)
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == replay-ost-single test 3: Fail OST during write, with verification ================================ 12:42:29 (1352148149)
LustreError: 17578:0:(vvp_io.c:1037:vvp_io_commit_write()) Write page 11 of inode ffff81031f41fb28 failed -2
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: /usr/sbin/lctl mark  replay-ost-single test_3: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_3 failed with 1 

Info required for matching: replay-ost-single 3

Issue Links

• is duplicated by: LU-2493 osp_precreate.c:781:osp_precreate_get_id()) ASSERTION( d->opd_pre_used_id < d->opd_pre_last_created )
• is related to: LU-9588 replay-ost-single test cases 3 remove from ALWAYS_EXCEPT
• is related to: LU-2832 Test failure on test suite replay-ost-single test_3: ost_write failure -19

Comments

[Andreas Dilger]

Close old bug that has not been seen in a long time.

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

another one in b2_5:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b3d5a116-9c60-11e3-8f3e-52540035b04c

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

another one:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/5121f06e-9b49-11e3-8a4e-52540035b04c

[Bob Glossman (Inactive)]

another one:
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/7c9d76dc-9b12-11e3-8ad7-52540035b04c

[Li Wei (Inactive)]

I have lowered the priority from "blocker" to "major". The last patch should be worked out before the release, but could wait after the feature freeze.

[Li Wei (Inactive)]

Only one test patch is left; I'd suggest lowering the priority from "blocker".

[Li Wei (Inactive)]

An update on the patches as of Dec 22:

http://review.whamcloud.com/4668 (Debug messages) Landed.
http://review.whamcloud.com/4511 (Orphan cleanup from correct ID) Landed.
http://review.whamcloud.com/4625 (opd_pre_last_created) Landed.
http://review.whamcloud.com/4590 (Block allocation during orphan cleanups) Landed.
http://review.whamcloud.com/4610 (New regression test) Being refreshed.

[Alex Zhuravlev]

> The new test. Still a bit real-time dependent.

there are a lot of tests depending on time already. all the 40-46 in sanityn, for example.

[Li Wei (Inactive)]

http://review.whamcloud.com/4610

The new test. Still a bit real-time dependent.

[Alex Zhuravlev]

look at something like:

/* This will trigger a watchdog timeout */
OBD_FAIL_TIMEOUT(OBD_FAIL_MDS_STATFS_LCW_SLEEP,
(MDT_SERVICE_WATCHDOG_FACTOR *
at_get(&svcpt->scp_at_estimate)) + 1);