Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3094

Sanity test_132: @@@@@@ FAIL: some glimpse RPC is expected and silent errors during mount

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Not a Bug
    • Minor
    • None
    • Lustre 2.4.0
    • None
    • The review queue in Maloo
    • 3
    • 7514

    Description

      Lustre Errors are reported in Sanity Test_132.

      I believe they are related to later errors that cannot read some /proc stats from the OST. LU-2902 (Sanity test 156) and LU-2735 (Sanity test 151) and example of the later issues.

      In general Test_132 remounts the OST and sometimes all it not well during the mount.

      Whenever I find missing data from the /proc filesystem I see Lustre Errors during test 132. The test does not allays fail 132 but there allways errors during the remount.

      I find the 132 issues by searching for Sanity 156/151 and looking for FAIL with " NOT IN CACHE: before: , after: " (the Null /proc reads)

      So what errors are seen?

      In the Sanity test 132 OST dmesg you see things like:

      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mkdir -p /mnt/ost3; mount -t lustre   		                   /dev/lvm-OSS/P3 /mnt/ost3
      LDISKFS-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. quota=on. Opts: 
      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: PATH=/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/opt/iozone/bin:/opt/iozone/bin:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/mpi:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests/racer:/usr/lib64/lustre/../lustre-iokit/sgpdd-survey:/usr/lib64/lustre/tests:/usr/lib64/lustre/u
      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: e2label /dev/lvm-OSS/P3 2>/dev/null
      Lustre: lustre-OST0001: deleting orphan objects from 0x0:6257 to 6304
      LustreError: 8844:0:(ldlm_resource.c:1161:ldlm_resource_get()) lvbo_init failed for resource 6272: rc -2
      LustreError: 8844:0:(ldlm_resource.c:1161:ldlm_resource_get()) Skipped 244 previous similar messages
      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mkdir -p /mnt/ost4
      
      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: test -b /dev/lvm-OSS/P5
      Lustre: lustre-OST0001: deleting orphan objects from 0x0:6257 to 6304
      Lustre: Skipped 2 previous similar messages
      LustreError: 10424:0:(ldlm_resource.c:1161:ldlm_resource_get()) lvbo_init failed for resource 5376: rc -2
      LustreError: 10424:0:(ldlm_resource.c:1161:ldlm_resource_get()) Skipped 22 previous similar messages
      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mkdir -p /mnt/ost5; mount -t lustre   		                   /dev/lvm-OSS/P5 /mnt/ost5
      LDISKFS-fs (dm-4): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. quota=on. Opts: 
      LustreError: 137-5: UUID 'lustre-OST0005_UUID' is not available for connect (no target)
      LustreError: 137-5: UUID 'lustre-OST0006_UUID' is not available for connect (no target)
      

      The Above strikes me a quite serious and it complains about finding the underlying storage target.

      Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: mkdir -p /mnt/ost3; mount -t lustre   		                   /dev/lvm-OSS/P3 /mnt/ost3
      LDISKFS-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. quota=on. Opts: 
      Lustre: 5288:0:(client.c:1868:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request sent has timed out for slow reply: [sent 1364764845/real 1364764845]  req@ffff88030461c800 x1431056565766172/t0(0) o38->lustre-MDT0000-lwp-OST0001@192.168.4.20@o2ib:12/10 lens 400/544 e 0 to 1 dl 1364764855 ref 1 fl Rpc:XN/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1
      Lustre: 5288:0:(client.c:1868:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) Skipped 3 previous similar messages
      LustreError: 11293:0:(client.c:1052:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) @@@ send limit expired   req@ffff880328c36000 x1431056565766204/t0(0) o101->MGC192.168.4.20@o2ib@192.168.4.20@o2ib:26/25 lens 328/344 e 0 to 0 dl 0 ref 2 fl Rpc:W/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1
      LustreError: 11293:0:(client.c:1052:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) Skipped 3 previous similar messages
      LustreError: 12040:0:(obd_mount.c:1715:server_register_target()) Cannot talk to the MGS: -5, not fatal
      

      In general the remount caused by 132 is quite messy in dmesg but it does not always seem to be the same errors. There seem to be communication issues. When 132 has these Lustre errors several other tests will have issues.

      Most of the time when the mount has errors 132 does not fail but sanity tests 133, 151, and 156 all fail together.

      I opened this as a blocker as I think this may be a root cause for several issues and deserves a proper evaluation.

      The runs below are recent example of the issues and there are plenty more if you search maloo:
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/786cf564-9b82-11e2-bd87-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/636517d2-98f3-11e2-af89-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/016cbfcc-9816-11e2-879d-52540035b04c

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-3094] Sanity test_132: @@@@@@ FAIL: some glimpse RPC is expected and silent errors during mount

            LU-2979 was the root cause of the real issue that I was hunting.

            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - LU-2979 was the root cause of the real issue that I was hunting.

            Yes it is not clear the errors seen in this test are the root cause of the failing of the /proc entries.

            I can get errors in 132 without the later errors so there is not a direct correlation.

            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - Yes it is not clear the errors seen in this test are the root cause of the failing of the /proc entries. I can get errors in 132 without the later errors so there is not a direct correlation.

            Those lvbo_init failed with -ENOENT errors should come from the orphan cleanup, when OST trying to cleanup orphan, it founds those objects are not existing. I didn't see why the orphans have been cleared, but it should not cause the test_132 or subsequent 151/156 failure.

            niu Niu Yawei (Inactive) added a comment - Those lvbo_init failed with -ENOENT errors should come from the orphan cleanup, when OST trying to cleanup orphan, it founds those objects are not existing. I didn't see why the orphans have been cleared, but it should not cause the test_132 or subsequent 151/156 failure.
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Niu

            Could you please look into this one?

            Thanks

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Niu Could you please look into this one? Thanks Peter
            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            In my local testing I see most of these error occurring without the loss of the /proc entries.

            Perhaps the errors are not "ERRORS".

            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - - edited In my local testing I see most of these error occurring without the loss of the /proc entries. Perhaps the errors are not "ERRORS".
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - - edited

            So, the objects being deleted during orphan removal seems to be accessed right afterwards (lvbo_init failures) which should not be possible for real orphans. Did we just delete referenced objects?
            This is potentially related to woes in LU-2657

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - - edited So, the objects being deleted during orphan removal seems to be accessed right afterwards (lvbo_init failures) which should not be possible for real orphans. Did we just delete referenced objects? This is potentially related to woes in LU-2657

            I am running a 132 133 151 156 test loop on my local vms for overnight testing.

            keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive) added a comment - I am running a 132 133 151 156 test loop on my local vms for overnight testing.

            People

              niu Niu Yawei (Inactive)
              keith Keith Mannthey (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: