Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3127

replay-single test_73b: fchmod: No such file or directory

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.4.0
    • Lustre 2.4.0, Lustre 2.7.0, Lustre 2.8.0, Lustre 2.5.4
    • 3
    • 7598

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark <nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run:
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ad12dece-9749-11e2-ba8e-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a1f7b6bc-98df-11e2-b7ea-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/a776f9e0-9d17-11e2-8b27-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b6d7fffe-9a35-11e2-9974-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c4c5812a-a05e-11e2-898f-52540035b04c

      The sub-test test_73b failed with the following error:

      test_73b failed with 1

      Info required for matching: replay-single 73b

      First failure in maloo is dated: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/ad12dece-9749-11e2-ba8e-52540035b04c 2013-03-27 14:17:52 UTC

      Client log seems to be failing on this multiop error:

      fchmod: No such file or directory

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-3127] replay-single test_73b: fchmod: No such file or directory

            The same failure "fchmod: No such file or directory" which was seen in LU-3127 is seen with replay-sanity test 73a. OBD_FAIL_LDLM_ENQUEUE_NET is missing in the code which is used in test_73a.

            maximus Ashish Purkar (Inactive) added a comment - The same failure "fchmod: No such file or directory" which was seen in LU-3127 is seen with replay-sanity test 73a. OBD_FAIL_LDLM_ENQUEUE_NET is missing in the code which is used in test_73a.

            Ashish Purkar (ashish.purkar@seagate.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/18118
            Subject: LU-3127 target: add missing fail_id code back
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: d1465c1d267b833883c1e5d6f9922a5004567f22

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Ashish Purkar (ashish.purkar@seagate.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/18118 Subject: LU-3127 target: add missing fail_id code back Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: d1465c1d267b833883c1e5d6f9922a5004567f22
            jamesanunez James Nunez (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I'm seeing this error in replay-single test 30 and 31 with ldiskfs, not zfs. Is this the same issue or should I open a new ticket? The logs are at: 2015-07-07 16:17:47 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0dc78356-251d-11e5-bf7b-5254006e85c2 2015-07-08 13:58:58 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/bd146d1c-25c5-11e5-a6b1-5254006e85c2 2015-07-21 04:39:40 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/b2be005c-2fb2-11e5-ad00-5254006e85c2 2015-07-20 11:51:53 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/9bb5ee50-2f22-11e5-bb5a-5254006e85c2 2015-07-22 14:21:40 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/2bd6032c-30d0-11e5-ad7f-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 05:26:13 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/054a81d0-3150-11e5-a788-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 05:36:34 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/1f8e89cc-3152-11e5-9558-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 08:49:47 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/54d88a1a-312f-11e5-9558-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 10:36:11 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/0da58c80-3178-11e5-9558-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 14:54:47 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a8bae426-3192-11e5-a788-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 17:43:51 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7c35334e-31af-11e5-9558-5254006e85c2 2015-07-23 22:17:07 - https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/c3e8da08-31d5-11e5-84cf-5254006e85c2 replay-single test 30 failures are tracked under LU-6841 .
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            The sub-test 28 failure was reported in LU-6651.

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - The sub-test 28 failure was reported in LU-6651 .
            sarah Sarah Liu added a comment - Hit this error on EL7 client on master branch: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/a5cde52e-df8a-11e4-bf2e-5254006e85c2
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment -

            While verifying patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13025 on Lustre b2_5 branch with FSTYPE=ldiskfs, the same failure occurred:
            https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e4fc03f8-8160-11e4-b551-5254006e85c2

            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - While verifying patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13025 on Lustre b2_5 branch with FSTYPE=ldiskfs, the same failure occurred: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/e4fc03f8-8160-11e4-b551-5254006e85c2
            sarah Sarah Liu added a comment -

            hit this error in interop between 2.5.3 client and 2.7 server:

            https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/592462ba-4733-11e4-8a80-5254006e85c2

            hadow-48vm2: CMD: shadow-48vm2.shadow.whamcloud.com lctl get_param -n at_max
            shadow-48vm1: CMD: shadow-48vm1.shadow.whamcloud.com lctl get_param -n at_max
            shadow-48vm2: mdc.lustre-MDT0000-mdc-*.mds_server_uuid in FULL state after 24 sec
            shadow-48vm1: mdc.lustre-MDT0000-mdc-*.mds_server_uuid in FULL state after 24 sec
            fchmod: No such file or directory
             replay-single test_73a: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_73a failed with 1 
            
            sarah Sarah Liu added a comment - hit this error in interop between 2.5.3 client and 2.7 server: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/592462ba-4733-11e4-8a80-5254006e85c2 hadow-48vm2: CMD: shadow-48vm2.shadow.whamcloud.com lctl get_param -n at_max shadow-48vm1: CMD: shadow-48vm1.shadow.whamcloud.com lctl get_param -n at_max shadow-48vm2: mdc.lustre-MDT0000-mdc-*.mds_server_uuid in FULL state after 24 sec shadow-48vm1: mdc.lustre-MDT0000-mdc-*.mds_server_uuid in FULL state after 24 sec fchmod: No such file or directory replay-single test_73a: @@@@@@ FAIL: test_73a failed with 1

            The landed patch only disabled replay-single.sh test_73b, it didn't fix anything.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - The landed patch only disabled replay-single.sh test_73b, it didn't fix anything.

            Patch landed. Let me know if more work is needed and I will reopen this ticket.

            jlevi Jodi Levi (Inactive) added a comment - Patch landed. Let me know if more work is needed and I will reopen this ticket.
            utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - http://review.whamcloud.com/6012

            People

              utopiabound Nathaniel Clark
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              12 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: