Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3272

block rename for FID_SEQ_DOT_LUSTRE, unify weird FID handling

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Minor
    • None
    • Lustre 2.4.0
    • 8109

    Description

      On LU-3245 Andreas said "Moving forward beyond the 6209 patch landing, it makes sense to explicitly block rename for the FID_SEQ_DOT_LUSTRE objects, since I don't think it ever makes sense to allow that."

      We should also review the other reint handlers checking for consistency with respect to the weird FIDs and, I hope, factor the cases into one or more "client may access this FID for R/W/X/..."

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is related to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. LU-3245 FS root OBF regression

          • Blocker - Blocks development and/or testing work, production could not run.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. LU-3181 open by FID for write with O_LOV_DELAY_CREATE fails for files on MDT1

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            People

              wc-triage WC Triage
              jhammond John Hammond
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated: