Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3294

osp_sync_llog_init(): ASSERTION( lgh != ((void *)0) ) failed

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • 3
    • 8157

    Description

      When starting an MDT on a SPARC MDS, this assertion failure occurred:

      Lustre: lustre-MDT0000: used disk, loading
      Lustre: lustre-OST0000-osc-MDT0000: Init llog for 0 - catid 0x2:0:0
      LustreError: 11309:0:(osp_sync.c:963:osp_sync_llog_init()) ASSERTION( lgh != ((void *)0) ) failed:
      LustreError: 11309:0:(osp_sync.c:963:osp_sync_llog_init()) LBUG
      Pid: 11309, comm: llog_process_th
      
      Call Trace:
      
      Kernel panic - not syncing: LBUG
      Call Trace:
       [0000000010181194] lbug_with_loc+0x94/0xc0 [libcfs]
       [0000000010dc28c8] osp_sync_llog_init+0xa28/0xc00 [osp]
       [0000000010dc6d78] osp_sync_init+0x1f8/0xbe0 [osp]
       [0000000010daf51c] osp_device_alloc+0x4d7c/0x5c40 [osp]
       [000000001033a500] class_setup+0x6e0/0xf00 [obdclass]
       [000000001033da58] class_process_config+0x1738/0x5180 [obdclass]
      [...]
      

      According to the "catid" printed, I guess the FID of the log must be [1:2:0]. The problem is in the definition of oat_id:

      struct ost_id { 
              union {
                      struct ostid {
                              __u64   oi_id;
                              __u64   oi_seq;
                      } oi;
                      struct lu_fid oi_fid;
              };      
      };
      

      When fid_to_logid() assigns a 64-bit sequence number to oi_seq, which 32 bits go to f_oid and f_ver really depends on the endianness of the MDS. On the SPARC MDS, the FID_SEQ_LLOG goes to f_ver, causing oatid_id() to return 0, while the log ID as a whole is nonzero. This combined caused osp_sync_llog_init() to neither open nor re-create the log.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              jhammond John Hammond
              liwei Li Wei (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: