[LU-3701] Failure on test suite posix subtest test_1: fcntl.18/fcntl.35 Unresolved

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Blocker
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.5.0, Lustre 2.4.2
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.5.0
• Labels: mn1
• Environment: server and client: lustre-master build: 1952
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Bruno Faccini (Inactive)
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/261745ba-fb5b-11e2-8c6e-52540035b04c.

The sub-test test_1 failed with the following error:

Run POSIX testsuite on /mnt/lustre failed

test log

SUCCESS SUMMARY:

News POSIX successes: 1

Test Name                   Baseline   Lustre Report
read.15                       Failed       Succeeded


FAILURE SUMMARY:

POSIX failures: 2

Test Name                   Baseline   Lustre Report
fcntl.18                   Succeeded      Unresolved
fcntl.35                   Succeeded      Unresolved

FAILURE DESCRIPTIONS:

####################################################
Test Name: fcntl.18 Unresolved

	Test Description:
For the XNFS specification:
    If the implementation supports file locking for files residing on
    a remote file system: On a call to fcntl(fildes, F_SETLKW, arg)
    when the lock specified by arg can not be set, waits until the
    lock can be set.
For the XSH specification:
    On a call to fcntl(fildes, F_SETLKW, arg) when the lock specified
    by arg can not be set, waits until the lock can be set.
    Posix Ref: Component FCNTL Assertion 6.5.2.2-23(A)

	Test Information:
deletion reason: External error - waitsync failed
deletion reason: External error - waitsync failed

####################################################
Test Name: fcntl.35 Unresolved

	Test Description:
For the XNFS specification:
    If the implementation supports file locking for files residing on
    a remote file system: EINTR in errno and -1 returned by fcntl() if
    the operation is interrupted by a signal.
For the XSH specification:
    EINTR in errno and -1 returned by fcntl() if the operation is
    interrupted by a signal.
    Posix Ref: Component FCNTL Assertion 6.5.2.4-40(A)

	Test Information:
child process timed out

Issue Links

• is related to: LU-2665 LBUG while unmounting client

Comments

[Peter Jones]

Bruno will look into this

[Sebastien Buisson (Inactive)]

Hi,

If the patch http://review.whamcloud.com/6415 from LU-2665 introduces a regression, we also need to find a solution for 2.1 and 2.4.
As I mentioned in LU-2665, the b2_1 patch will be rolled out at CEA in a couple of weeks!

Thanks,
Sebastien.

[Peter Jones]

Reverted LU-2665 from b2_4 to avoid this problem but we still need to find a solution for 2.5

[Peter Jones]

Oleg

What do you suggest here?

Peter

[Jian Yu]

Hi Oleg,

LU-2665 mdc: Keep resend FLocks (http://review.whamcloud.com/6415) caused the above regression.

On master branch, posix test passed on build #1560. However, build #1561 and #1562 were not tested. The test failed on build #1563. Here are the patches in those builds:

Build #1561: LU-2665 mdc: Keep resend FLocks
Build #1562: LU-3568 contrib: ignore initial comments
Build #1563: LU-3478 iokit: fix sgpdd-survey scripts (output and plotting)

Only "LU-2665 mdc: Keep resend FLocks" is in Lustre b2_4 build #28, so that's the culprit.

[Jian Yu]

Hi Oleg,

On Lustre b2_4 branch, this is a regression issue introduced by the patch in build http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/28/ :

https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/23814618-02b1-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4854f044-0283-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c5113ad6-0286-11e3-b384-52540035b04c
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6dd63b10-0261-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c
https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/4493f2a0-0249-11e3-a4b4-52540035b04c

FYI, the posix test passed on Lustre b2_4 build #27.

[Oleg Drokin]

in client dmesg:

Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: Run POSIX test against lustre filesystem
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -11.
LustreError: Skipped 8 previous similar messages
LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0000-mdc-ffff880331591c00: Communicating with 192.168.4.20@o2ib, operation ldlm_enqueue failed with -35.
LustreError: Skipped 2 previous similar messages

But nothing like that on MDS

[Andreas Dilger]

Is the client being mounted with "-o flock"?