Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3795

replay-single test_58b test_58c: trusted.foo: No such attribute

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Blocker
    • Lustre 2.5.0
    • Lustre 2.5.0
    • 3
    • 9813

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark <nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: http://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/383816e8-097f-11e3-901c-52540035b04c.

      The sub-test test_58b failed with the following error:

      /mnt/lustre2/d0.replay-single/d58/f.replay-single.58b: trusted.foo: No such attribute
      test_58b failed with 1

      Info required for matching: replay-single 58b

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-3795] replay-single test_58b test_58c: trusted.foo: No such attribute

            Thanks, Emoly. Please, reopen if the problem reoccurs in the future.

            panda Andrew Perepechko added a comment - Thanks, Emoly. Please, reopen if the problem reoccurs in the future.
            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment -

            Andrew, you are right. Sorry to reopen this one.

            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment - Andrew, you are right. Sorry to reopen this one.
            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment -

            I searched Maloo test results in this link https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/query?utf8=✓&test_set%5Btest_set_script_id%5D=f6a12204-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&sub_test%5Bsub_test_script_id%5D=fb022be0-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&sub_test%5Bstatus%5D=FAIL&sub_test%5Bquery_bugs%5D=&test_session%5Btest_host%5D=&test_session%5Btest_group%5D=&test_session%5Buser_id%5D=&test_session%5Bquery_date%5D=&test_session%5Bquery_recent_period%5D=&test_node%5Bos_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Bdistribution_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Barchitecture_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Bfile_system_type_id%5D=00437f32-318d-11e1-9c6d-5254004bbbd3&test_node%5Blustre_branch_id%5D=&test_node_network%5Bnetwork_type_id%5D=&commit=Update+results

            I didn't check each one. Maybe you are right, their parent commit is earlier than LU-3669 fix. If so, please close this ticket and ignore my previous comments.

            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment - I searched Maloo test results in this link https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/query?utf8= ✓&test_set%5Btest_set_script_id%5D=f6a12204-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&sub_test%5Bsub_test_script_id%5D=fb022be0-32c3-11e0-a61c-52540025f9ae&sub_test%5Bstatus%5D=FAIL&sub_test%5Bquery_bugs%5D=&test_session%5Btest_host%5D=&test_session%5Btest_group%5D=&test_session%5Buser_id%5D=&test_session%5Bquery_date%5D=&test_session%5Bquery_recent_period%5D=&test_node%5Bos_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Bdistribution_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Barchitecture_type_id%5D=&test_node%5Bfile_system_type_id%5D=00437f32-318d-11e1-9c6d-5254004bbbd3&test_node%5Blustre_branch_id%5D=&test_node_network%5Bnetwork_type_id%5D=&commit=Update+results I didn't check each one. Maybe you are right, their parent commit is earlier than LU-3669 fix. If so, please close this ticket and ignore my previous comments.

            The fixes were landed on Sep, 11 (see http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7208/), not two months ago.

            It's not clear whether your reports are based on sources more recent than of that date.

            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c was ran on Sep 10.
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c was ran on Sep 23, the build links to http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7584/, which appears to be Patch Set 8 or earlier (Patch set 9 was uploaded on Sep 25) and the parent commit for Patch set 8 is c0e6982b57319e5044cf12bee509c0c571a17cc5, which was landed on Aug 7.

            panda Andrew Perepechko added a comment - The fixes were landed on Sep, 11 (see http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7208/ ), not two months ago. It's not clear whether your reports are based on sources more recent than of that date. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c was ran on Sep 10. https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c was ran on Sep 23, the build links to http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/7584/ , which appears to be Patch Set 8 or earlier (Patch set 9 was uploaded on Sep 25) and the parent commit for Patch set 8 is c0e6982b57319e5044cf12bee509c0c571a17cc5, which was landed on Aug 7.
            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment -

            I reopen this ticket because through investigation on LU-3625, I find still many zfs tests hit this error in recent two months, such as:
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b278ad30-24ac-11e3-93a0-52540035b04c
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54b1a140-22e3-11e3-9488-52540035b04c
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c

            "No such attribute" happens much more frequently than "No such file or directory".

            emoly.liu Emoly Liu added a comment - I reopen this ticket because through investigation on LU-3625 , I find still many zfs tests hit this error in recent two months, such as: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/b278ad30-24ac-11e3-93a0-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/243e1cd2-24f0-11e3-839b-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/54b1a140-22e3-11e3-9488-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/5bb89698-1a4f-11e3-a95b-52540035b04c "No such attribute" happens much more frequently than "No such file or directory".

            This is verified fixed by LU-3669 closure

            utopiabound Nathaniel Clark added a comment - This is verified fixed by LU-3669 closure
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - - edited

            Nathaniel

            Please verify whether this is still an issue after LU-3669 fix has landed

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - - edited Nathaniel Please verify whether this is still an issue after LU-3669 fix has landed Peter

            The first (ZFS) report is a duplicate of LU-3713 which is fixed by http://review.whamcloud.com/7208 in the context of LU-3669.

            The second report does not look xattr cache related (no traces of xattr operations either in the MDS or in the client debug logs), "No such file or directory" probably relates to the fact that there was no such file or directory, rather than an xattr failure.

            panda Andrew Perepechko added a comment - The first (ZFS) report is a duplicate of LU-3713 which is fixed by http://review.whamcloud.com/7208 in the context of LU-3669 . The second report does not look xattr cache related (no traces of xattr operations either in the MDS or in the client debug logs), "No such file or directory" probably relates to the fact that there was no such file or directory, rather than an xattr failure.

            This looks like it also failed on non-zfs testing:
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/749022be-07dd-11e3-bcfa-52540035b04c

            and the first failure was on 2013-07-29 00:48:20 UTC
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/e2333076-f87a-11e2-a8b3-52540035b04c

            and according to http://review.whamcloud.com/5537 the xattr cache patch landed on 07-29 also.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - This looks like it also failed on non-zfs testing: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/749022be-07dd-11e3-bcfa-52540035b04c and the first failure was on 2013-07-29 00:48:20 UTC https://maloo.whamcloud.com/sub_tests/e2333076-f87a-11e2-a8b3-52540035b04c and according to http://review.whamcloud.com/5537 the xattr cache patch landed on 07-29 also.

            People

              utopiabound Nathaniel Clark
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: