Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-3647 HSM _not only_ small fixes and to do list goes here
  3. LU-3863

sanity-hsm test_111a: FAIL: request on 0x200000402:0x50:0x0 is not FAILED

Details

    • Technical task
    • Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.6.0
    • Lustre 2.5.0
    • 10025

    Description

      Lustre build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-reviews/17795/

      sanity-hsm test 111a failed as follows:

      Remove from backend: 0x200000402:0x50:0x0 = /home/autotest/.autotest/shared_dir/2013-08-29/110531-70153027668640/arc1/0050/0000/0402/0000/0002/0000/0x200000402:0x50:0x0
CMD: client-32vm3 /usr/sbin/lctl get_param -n mdt.lustre-MDT0000.hsm.agent_actions | awk '/'0x200000402:0x50:0x0'.*action='RESTORE'/ {print \$13}' | cut -f2 -d=
Changed after 0s: from '' to 'SUCCEED'
Waiting 100 secs for update
<~snip~>
Update not seen after 100s: wanted 'FAILED' got ''
 sanity-hsm test_111a: @@@@@@ FAIL: request on 0x200000402:0x50:0x0 is not FAILED

      Maloo report: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c4fa2ece-1148-11e3-a6be-52540035b04c

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is related to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. LU-3761 sanity-hsm 55: request on 0x2000013a3:0x2:0x0 is not FAILED

          • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            [LU-3863] sanity-hsm test_111a: FAIL: request on 0x200000402:0x50:0x0 is not FAILED
            jay Jinshan Xiong (Inactive) added a comment -

            This issue has not seen for a long time. Let's close it for now

            jay Jinshan Xiong (Inactive) added a comment - This issue has not seen for a long time. Let's close it for now
            bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment -

            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6d230122-24f7-11e3-80e5-52540035b04c

            bogl Bob Glossman (Inactive) added a comment - https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/6d230122-24f7-11e3-80e5-52540035b04c
            niu Niu Yawei (Inactive) added a comment -

            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/a849d4da-17bc-11e3-a71f-52540035b04c
            https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/9eb2d96a-1f34-11e3-8cea-52540035b04c

            niu Niu Yawei (Inactive) added a comment - https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/a849d4da-17bc-11e3-a71f-52540035b04c https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sessions/9eb2d96a-1f34-11e3-8cea-52540035b04c
            jcl jacques-charles lafoucriere added a comment -

            This test is for no retry mode. The idea is to make a restore failed, so for this we remove the file in the backend. Here the restore is successful, so the remove is not done or the restore test is wrong.

            jcl jacques-charles lafoucriere added a comment - This test is for no retry mode. The idea is to make a restore failed, so for this we remove the file in the backend. Here the restore is successful, so the remove is not done or the restore test is wrong.
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

            I wonder how does that differ from LU-3761 other than a different test number? Probably same issue?

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - I wonder how does that differ from LU-3761 other than a different test number? Probably same issue?

            People

              jay Jinshan Xiong (Inactive)
              yujian Jian Yu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: