Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-5130

Test failure sanity test_17n: destroy remote dir error 0

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Critical
    • None
    • Lustre 2.6.0
    • None
    • 3
    • 14157

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Nathaniel Clark <nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run:
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/f8142678-e8e5-11e3-849b-52540035b04c
      https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/92c4a4ee-e4fa-11e3-a294-52540035b04c

      The sub-test test_17n failed with the following error:

      rm: cannot remove `/mnt/lustre/d17n.sanity/remote_dir_0': Stale file handle
      destroy remote dir error 0

      Info required for matching: sanity 17n

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-5130] Test failure sanity test_17n: destroy remote dir error 0

            Patch landed to Master.

            jlevi Jodi Levi (Inactive) added a comment - Patch landed to Master.

            Andreas: it is a fix for remote dir unlink error, not just optimization, so probably should go into 2.6.0. The patch still have some problem according to the maloon test, I am trying to figure out now. Thanks.

            di.wang Di Wang (Inactive) added a comment - Andreas: it is a fix for remote dir unlink error, not just optimization, so probably should go into 2.6.0. The patch still have some problem according to the maloon test, I am trying to figure out now. Thanks.

            Di, is the http://review.whamcloud.com/10841 patch fixing a critical enough problem that it should land for 2.6.0, or is it just an optimization?

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Di, is the http://review.whamcloud.com/10841 patch fixing a critical enough problem that it should land for 2.6.0, or is it just an optimization?
            di.wang Di Wang (Inactive) added a comment - http://review.whamcloud.com/10841

            This seems related with lod object initialization process, which unnecessarily load the stripping object, I will cook a patch.

            di.wang Di Wang (Inactive) added a comment - This seems related with lod object initialization process, which unnecessarily load the stripping object, I will cook a patch.

            Di, can you take a quick look at this? Is this a regression of some kind?

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Di, can you take a quick look at this? Is this a regression of some kind?

            People

              di.wang Di Wang (Inactive)
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: