[LU-5273] Test failure on test suite sanity-scrub, subtest test_10a ldlm_lock2desc()) ASSERTION( lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits == (MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP | MDS_INODELOCK_UPDATE | MDS_INODELOCK_LAYOUT) ) failed: Inappropriate inode lock bits during conversion 3

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Duplicate
• Priority: Minor
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: WC Triage
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for wangdi <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/38525c26-fe87-11e3-a668-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_10a failed with the following error:

18:33:35:LustreError: 11-0: lustre-MDT0003-mdc-ffff88007bed2000: Communicating with 10.1.4.75@tcp, operation mds_connect failed with -16.
18:33:35:LustreError: Skipped 28 previous similar messages
18:33:35:LustreError: 14919:0:(ldlm_lock.c:671:ldlm_lock2desc()) ASSERTION( lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits == (MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP | MDS_INODELOCK_UPDATE | MDS_INODELOCK_LAYOUT) ) failed: Inappropriate inode lock bits during conversion 3
18:33:35:LustreError: 14919:0:(ldlm_lock.c:671:ldlm_lock2desc()) LBUG
18:33:35:Pid: 14919, comm: diff
18:33:35:
18:33:35:Call Trace:
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa03d0895>] libcfs_debug_dumpstack+0x55/0x80 [libcfs]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa03d0e97>] lbug_with_loc+0x47/0xb0 [libcfs]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa08d9f69>] ldlm_lock2desc+0x179/0x180 [ptlrpc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa08ebe0d>] ldlm_cli_enqueue+0x1fd/0x890 [ptlrpc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa091235a>] ? ptlrpc_request_set_replen+0x3a/0x60 [ptlrpc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa08f0d30>] ? ldlm_completion_ast+0x0/0x930 [ptlrpc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa12866a0>] ? ll_md_blocking_ast+0x0/0x7f0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa0864e98>] mdc_enqueue+0x2b8/0x1a60 [mdc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa0866822>] mdc_intent_lock+0x1e2/0x5f9 [mdc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa12866a0>] ? ll_md_blocking_ast+0x0/0x7f0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa08f0d30>] ? ldlm_completion_ast+0x0/0x930 [ptlrpc]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa053aed8>] ? lprocfs_counter_add+0x1a8/0x1c0 [obdclass]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa082cb47>] lmv_intent_remote+0x337/0xa80 [lmv]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa12866a0>] ? ll_md_blocking_ast+0x0/0x7f0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa082ebd8>] lmv_intent_lock+0xf58/0x1020 [lmv]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa03e0f03>] ? libcfs_debug_vmsg2+0x5d3/0xbc0 [libcfs]
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8116f303>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1a3/0x1b0
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa1284709>] ? ll_i2suppgid+0x19/0x30 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa128474e>] ? ll_i2gids+0x2e/0xd0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa12866a0>] ? ll_md_blocking_ast+0x0/0x7f0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa1288297>] ll_lookup_it+0x257/0xac0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffffa1288d67>] ll_lookup_nd+0x267/0x5e0 [lustre]
18:33:35: [<ffffffff811986f5>] do_lookup+0x1a5/0x230
18:33:35: [<ffffffff81198a80>] __link_path_walk+0x200/0xff0
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8114a257>] ? handle_pte_fault+0xf7/0xb00
18:33:35: [<ffffffff81199b2a>] path_walk+0x6a/0xe0
18:33:35: [<ffffffff81199d3b>] filename_lookup+0x6b/0xc0
18:33:35: [<ffffffff81196666>] ? final_putname+0x26/0x50
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8119ae67>] user_path_at+0x57/0xa0
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8104a98c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x480
18:33:35: [<ffffffff812824f5>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x55/0x80
18:33:35: [<ffffffff811aa6b0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8118e474>] ? cp_new_stat+0xe4/0x100
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8118e6b0>] vfs_fstatat+0x50/0xa0
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8118e82b>] vfs_stat+0x1b/0x20
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8118e854>] sys_newstat+0x24/0x50
18:33:35: [<ffffffff810e1cc7>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
18:33:35: [<ffffffff810e1abe>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x25e/0x290
18:33:35: [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
18:33:35:

test failed to respond and timed out

Info required for matching: sanity-scrub 10a

Issue Links

• is duplicated by: LU-4971 sanity-scrub test_2: ldlm_lock2desc()) ASSERTION( lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits == (MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP | MDS_INODELOCK_UPDATE | MDS_INODELOCK_LAYOUT)failed