[LU-6044] sanityn test_34: ldlm_add_waiting_lock()) ASSERTION( (((( lock))->l_flags & (1ULL << 52)) != 0) ) failed

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Duplicate
• Priority: Minor
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.7.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: WC Triage
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for Andreas Dilger <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/3cf1c250-8616-11e4-b909-5254006e85c2.

The sub-test test_34 failed with the following error on the OST:

01:33:06:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanityn test 34: no lock timeout under IO == 08:33:02 (1418805182)
01:33:06:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lctl get_param -n ldlm.namespaces.filter-*.lock_timeouts
01:33:06:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lctl set_param fail_loc=0x512
01:33:06:Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: lctl set_param fail_loc=0x512
01:33:06:Lustre: *** cfs_fail_loc=512, val=0***
01:33:06:LustreError: 11571:0:(fail.c:132:__cfs_fail_timeout_set()) cfs_fail_timeout id 512 sleeping for 4000ms
01:33:06:Lustre: *** cfs_fail_loc=512, val=0***
01:33:06:LustreError: 3951:0:(ldlm_lockd.c:406:ldlm_add_waiting_lock()) ASSERTION( (((( lock))->l_flags & (1ULL << 52)) != 0) ) failed: 
01:33:06:LustreError: 3951:0:(ldlm_lockd.c:406:ldlm_add_waiting_lock()) LBUG

Please provide additional information about the failure here.

Info required for matching: sanityn 34

Issue Links

• is duplicated by: LU-6032 no need to disable softirq for export:exp_rpc_lock