Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-6206

conf-sanity test_53a: Insane OST thread counts

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Incomplete
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 17360

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/29448bbe-ac56-11e4-b832-5254006e85c2.

      The sub-test test_53a failed with the following error:

      $'Assertion 27 failed: (($tmax2 < $tmin)) (expanded: ((4 < 3)))
      Insane OST thread counts'
      

      Suspect this may be due to the very recent landing of LU-1214 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads.
      It made changes in the close neighborhood of the failed tests.

      Info required for matching: conf-sanity 53a

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-6206] conf-sanity test_53a: Insane OST thread counts

            This test is no longer failing. Will leave cleanups to some future date.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - This test is no longer failing. Will leave cleanups to some future date.

            Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/14682/
            Subject: Revert "LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads"
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: e15535ff63bf90b93fa33393ed5d7f7f85813895

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/14682/ Subject: Revert " LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads" Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: e15535ff63bf90b93fa33393ed5d7f7f85813895

            Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/14682
            Subject: Revert "LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads"
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 241fd8ca40271665c399d79ded71d0a8d28a247a

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/14682 Subject: Revert " LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads" Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 241fd8ca40271665c399d79ded71d0a8d28a247a

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13823/
            Subject: LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: cafa669a43062c5097d40803b9ba14e66edbae25

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13823/ Subject: LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: cafa669a43062c5097d40803b9ba14e66edbae25

            Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/13823
            Subject: LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 34ec2c93de940ecca8dcf2aa6c760cf8c1b133cc

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Andreas Dilger (andreas.dilger@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/13823 Subject: LU-6206 ptlrpc: start minimum service threads Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 34ec2c93de940ecca8dcf2aa6c760cf8c1b133cc

            PS: we are also investigating how/why Maloo marked this test failure with Verified +1 when it clearly failed the review-dne-part-1 test.

            We know that review-zfs is currently optional so the presence of a failure in that test wouldn't itself cause Maloo to mark the overall result -1, but the other failure should have. It should be noted that (excluding the hit from this issue) we have resolved a major blocker for ZFS testing (LU-5242) and are expecting to change review-zfs test results to be enforced in the near future now that we expect it to pass regularly.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - PS: we are also investigating how/why Maloo marked this test failure with Verified +1 when it clearly failed the review-dne-part-1 test. We know that review-zfs is currently optional so the presence of a failure in that test wouldn't itself cause Maloo to mark the overall result -1, but the other failure should have. It should be noted that (excluding the hit from this issue) we have resolved a major blocker for ZFS testing ( LU-5242 ) and are expecting to change review-zfs test results to be enforced in the near future now that we expect it to pass regularly.

            Thanks James.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Thanks James.

            People

              adilger Andreas Dilger
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: