Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-6207

conf-sanity test_83: test failed to respond and timed out

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Critical
    • Lustre 2.8.0
    • None
    • 3
    • 17363

    Description

      This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>

      This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/4db5899a-ab42-11e4-b27f-5254006e85c2.

      The sub-test test_83 failed with the following error:

      test failed to respond and timed out
      

      Please provide additional information about the failure here.

      Info required for matching: conf-sanity 83

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-6207] conf-sanity test_83: test failed to respond and timed out
            ys Yang Sheng added a comment -

            Patches landed. Close ticket.

            ys Yang Sheng added a comment - Patches landed. Close ticket.

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13649/
            Subject: LU-6207 osd: add osd_ost_fini in osd_obj_map_init
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 948794929c5724e6a78b2c470bf97bcea1a67555

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13649/ Subject: LU-6207 osd: add osd_ost_fini in osd_obj_map_init Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 948794929c5724e6a78b2c470bf97bcea1a67555
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Ah yes. Thanks for pointing that out.

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Ah yes. Thanks for pointing that out.

            Hello Peter Jones.
            I think this ticket should not be closed before the 2nd patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13649 will be landed.
            I added new test to conf-sanity in http://review.whamcloud.com/13648. But new test(conf-sanity_85) may cause kernel panic in similar place with the same symptoms in osd.
            So please take care that http://review.whamcloud.com/13649 is landed.
            Thank you

            scherementsev Sergey Cheremencev added a comment - Hello Peter Jones. I think this ticket should not be closed before the 2nd patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13649 will be landed. I added new test to conf-sanity in http://review.whamcloud.com/13648 . But new test(conf-sanity_85) may cause kernel panic in similar place with the same symptoms in osd. So please take care that http://review.whamcloud.com/13649 is landed. Thank you
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Landed for 2.8

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.8

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13648/
            Subject: LU-6207 osd: add dput in osd_ost_init
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 51c90a076884a8cda2bcc655058be43c2c0dced2

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13648/ Subject: LU-6207 osd: add dput in osd_ost_init Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 51c90a076884a8cda2bcc655058be43c2c0dced2
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Yang Sheng

            Could you please take care of this patch?

            Thanks

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Yang Sheng Could you please take care of this patch? Thanks Peter

            Hi, Oleg

            I don't think that LU-5729 is buggy. It seems there is also several places where cleanup is not done correctly.
            We faced the similar problem after LU-5729(MRP-2109) and I prepared 2 patches.
            http://review.whamcloud.com/13648
            After above patch we hit the issue again and I found another place where dput is forgotten.
            2nd patch
            http://review.whamcloud.com/13649

            scherementsev Sergey Cheremencev added a comment - Hi, Oleg I don't think that LU-5729 is buggy. It seems there is also several places where cleanup is not done correctly. We faced the similar problem after LU-5729 (MRP-2109) and I prepared 2 patches. http://review.whamcloud.com/13648 After above patch we hit the issue again and I found another place where dput is forgotten. 2nd patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13649

            People

              ys Yang Sheng
              maloo Maloo
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              10 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: