Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Major
    • Lustre 2.9.0
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      Addition of LU-2049 patch http://review.whamcloud.com/7793 seems to be breaking interop in particular test 78 of sanity.sh so I filing this ticket just in case.

      I am testing with upstream client, but 2.5 and 2.7 at the very least are likely affected, possibly even 2.8, so we need to double check.

      With the patch in place on the server, client running test 78 fails on the 5th iteration like this:
      directIO rdwr round 5 of 5
      directio on /mnt/lustre/f78.sanity for 130x1048576 bytes
      Write error Success (rc = 83886080, len = 136314880)
      sanity test_78: @@@@@@ FAIL: rdwr failed

      This suggests the write was short due to overzealous limitation of free space on the server or something else.

      I confirmed that removing that patch fixes the failure.

      additional issue - test 78 does not cleanup the big file on error leading to a chain of out of space failures later on in the sanity.sh at least in my setup

      This is on ldiskfs

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-7803] sanity test 78 failures in interop
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Landed for 2.9

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.9

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/21808/
            Subject: LU-7803 tests: Cleanup after sanity/78
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 76c696d545677bab4ce9641b9eff338fe99f6396

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/21808/ Subject: LU-7803 tests: Cleanup after sanity/78 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 76c696d545677bab4ce9641b9eff338fe99f6396
            green Oleg Drokin added a comment -

            hm, this won't fix failure in the patchless upstream client, though, and it typically uses master scripts.
            When run manually it might be ignored, but it is also run auomaticlaly at times, so I wonder how to better approach this for that case?

            I guess not much could be done considering we don't use master scripts at all times there too...

            green Oleg Drokin added a comment - hm, this won't fix failure in the patchless upstream client, though, and it typically uses master scripts. When run manually it might be ignored, but it is also run auomaticlaly at times, so I wonder how to better approach this for that case? I guess not much could be done considering we don't use master scripts at all times there too...

            Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/21808
            Subject: LU-7803 tests: Cleanup after sanity/78
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 32cdae7e13fbe23f0a8caf165ddb1ac7331ddffa

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Nathaniel Clark (nathaniel.l.clark@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/21808 Subject: LU-7803 tests: Cleanup after sanity/78 Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 32cdae7e13fbe23f0a8caf165ddb1ac7331ddffa

            People

              utopiabound Nathaniel Clark
              green Oleg Drokin
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: