Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-8294

Noisy gss_svc_upcall_handle_init

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.10.0
    • None
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      I noticed that ever since I enabled gss builds, I am getting some spam in my dmesg like this:

      [  979.361247] Lustre: 12252:0:(gss_svc_upcall.c:998:gss_svc_upcall_handle_init()) cache_check return ENOENT, drop
[  979.362449] Lustre: 12252:0:(gss_svc_upcall.c:998:gss_svc_upcall_handle_init()) Skipped 9 previous similar messages

      Sine I don't really have anything security-related configured during these runs, I imagine these warnings need to be silenced to only happen when they are really needed.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is related to

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. LU-13143 detect console spew during (interop) testing

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Open

          Activity

            [LU-8294] Noisy gss_svc_upcall_handle_init
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Landed for 2.10

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Landed for 2.10
            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment -

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/26976/
            Subject: LU-8294 gss: quiet cache_check return ENOENT warning
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 01787a308ccaf0cfbd6423609e63e741e3a65a14

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/26976/ Subject: LU-8294 gss: quiet cache_check return ENOENT warning Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 01787a308ccaf0cfbd6423609e63e741e3a65a14
            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment -

            Kit Westneat (kit.westneat@gmail.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26976
            Subject: LU-8294 gss: quiet cache_check return ENOENT warning
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: bf0bc04ae0c3f9460d4312e0bef5eb722c66ec90

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Kit Westneat (kit.westneat@gmail.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26976 Subject: LU-8294 gss: quiet cache_check return ENOENT warning Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: bf0bc04ae0c3f9460d4312e0bef5eb722c66ec90
            jhammond John Hammond added a comment -

            > so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix?

            Yes.

            jhammond John Hammond added a comment - > so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix? Yes.
            kit.westneat Kit Westneat (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Peter,

            I don't know enough about GSS to speak with much authority on it. Although that also gives me some ability to say that I think a sys admin new to GSS and Lustre would not have much use for that error message, so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix?

            Thanks,
            Kit

            kit.westneat Kit Westneat (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Peter, I don't know enough about GSS to speak with much authority on it. Although that also gives me some ability to say that I think a sys admin new to GSS and Lustre would not have much use for that error message, so perhaps the short term fix is to change the CWARN to CDEBUG(D_SEC, ...)? Would that be an acceptable fix? Thanks, Kit
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Kit

            Is this something that you will have bandwidth to work on over the coming weeks? I am trying to assess whether we will be able to include this fix in 2.10

            Thanks

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Kit Is this something that you will have bandwidth to work on over the coming weeks? I am trying to assess whether we will be able to include this fix in 2.10 Thanks Peter

            People

              kit.westneat Kit Westneat (Inactive)
              green Oleg Drokin
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: