Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-8679

Lustre-2.8.0 with Mellanox Driver

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Critical
    • None
    • Lustre 2.8.0
    • None
    • Mlnx 3.x with Lustre 2.8.0

    Description

      Dear Team,

      Need your help in adding MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.3-1.0.4.0 in the Lustre 2.8.0 Infiniband stack.

      Thank you
      Atul Yadav

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          duplicates

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. LU-8675 Lustre 2.8.0 + Centos 6.7 + MLNX_OFED-3.3-1.0.4.0

          • Critical - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Resolved

          Activity

            [LU-8679] Lustre-2.8.0 with Mellanox Driver
            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment -

            Hi Team,

            Can we have solution of my problem...

            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment - Hi Team, Can we have solution of my problem...
            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment -

            Hi Team,

            Waiting for your input...

            Thanks in advance...
            Atul Yadav

            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment - Hi Team, Waiting for your input... Thanks in advance... Atul Yadav
            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment -

            Peter,

            We are using the luster server binary from the "https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/el6.7/server/"

            And for the client we are building it from the same source of repostiery.

            The reason for changiing the IB stack to MLNX on client side is given below:-
            Ansys application performance on MLNX IB stack is good.
            MSC Nastran application performance on MLNX IB stack is good.
            Home grown binary are perfectly tuned for MLNX IB stack.

            That's the reason, there is a need of changing lustre IB stack to MLNX IB stack for using 150 TB storage.

            Any guidance to achieve the requirement will be helpful.

            Thank You
            Atul Yadav

            atulyadavtech Atul Yadav added a comment - Peter, We are using the luster server binary from the "https://downloads.hpdd.intel.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.8.0/el6.7/server/" And for the client we are building it from the same source of repostiery. The reason for changiing the IB stack to MLNX on client side is given below:- Ansys application performance on MLNX IB stack is good. MSC Nastran application performance on MLNX IB stack is good. Home grown binary are perfectly tuned for MLNX IB stack. That's the reason, there is a need of changing lustre IB stack to MLNX IB stack for using 150 TB storage. Any guidance to achieve the requirement will be helpful. Thank You Atul Yadav
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Atul

            This issue tracker is focused on matters relating to upcoming community releases (at the moment 2.9 is our focus). If you want general help on usage with older releases (rather than reporting a bug which may still exist in the current releases) then you would be better off to either contact your Lustre support provider or else post to the lustre-idiscuss mailing list

            Peter

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Atul This issue tracker is focused on matters relating to upcoming community releases (at the moment 2.9 is our focus). If you want general help on usage with older releases (rather than reporting a bug which may still exist in the current releases) then you would be better off to either contact your Lustre support provider or else post to the lustre-idiscuss mailing list Peter

            People

              wc-triage WC Triage
              atulyadavtech Atul Yadav
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: