Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.10.0
    • Lustre 2.10.0
    • None
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      While porting more patches to upstream the problem of __umoddi reappeared with new patches that landed. The patches that landed with this defect are:

      http://review.whamcloud.com/15316
      http://review.whamcloud.com/10458

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-8835] More 64 bit divides without do_div.
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            Fixed in 2.10

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - Fixed in 2.10

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/23814/
            Subject: LU-8835 osc: handle 64 bit time properly in osc_cache_too_much
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 11dfa318972db8c8d4bdc36848a4aee8072557f7

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/23814/ Subject: LU-8835 osc: handle 64 bit time properly in osc_cache_too_much Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 11dfa318972db8c8d4bdc36848a4aee8072557f7

            I found the do_div issues in llog.c has already been fixed in master (LU-6134). Its just missing from b2_8_fe. The other do_div bug was introduced with the move to 64 bit time upstream. I submitted a patch here that moves to 64 bit time and resolves the do_div issue. I submitted to master so people can review this work to make sure I did it right,

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - I found the do_div issues in llog.c has already been fixed in master ( LU-6134 ). Its just missing from b2_8_fe. The other do_div bug was introduced with the move to 64 bit time upstream. I submitted a patch here that moves to 64 bit time and resolves the do_div issue. I submitted to master so people can review this work to make sure I did it right,

            James Simmons (uja.ornl@yahoo.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/23814
            Subject: LU-8835 osc: handle 64 bit time properly in osc_cache_too_much
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 3406027771e3a9cc45f085e84a3c072d54974b48

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - James Simmons (uja.ornl@yahoo.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/23814 Subject: LU-8835 osc: handle 64 bit time properly in osc_cache_too_much Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 3406027771e3a9cc45f085e84a3c072d54974b48

            Hi Yang Sheng,

            Can you please have a look at this?

            Thanks.
            Joe

            jgmitter Joseph Gmitter (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Yang Sheng, Can you please have a look at this? Thanks. Joe

            People

              ys Yang Sheng
              simmonsja James A Simmons
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: