[LU-9369] lfs find can't work correctly

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Minor
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.10.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Emoly Liu
• Reporter: Emoly Liu

Description

This issue can be reproduced by the following steps:

mkdir /mnt/lustre/dir1
mkdir /mnt/lustre/dir2
lfs setstripe -c 3 /mnt/lustre/dir1/file
lfs setstripe -c 3 /mnt/lustre/dir2/file
lfs find /mnt/lustre -c 3

Then, you will see the output is

/mnt/lustre/dir1/file
/mnt/lustre/dir2
/mnt/lustre/dir2/file

I will create a fix.

Comments

[Peter Jones]

Landed for 2.10

[Gerrit Updater]

Oleg Drokin ([e-mail]) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/26914/
Subject: LU-9369 lfs: make lfs find work correctly
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: b0404c136240a578655554d37689b47b47ef5920

[Gerrit Updater]

Emoly Liu ([e-mail]) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/26914
Subject: LU-9369 lfs: make lfs find work correctly
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 01ee10671587faab7a30284e78022f1a16a9e800

[Emoly Liu]

Niu, thanks for your patch! It does fix this issue.

[Niu Yawei (Inactive)]

I think it could be an old bug, cb_find_init() mistakenly used previous file's lum for the next dir, because the dir doesn't have default layout. Old code happen to zeroed the stripe count every time, that's probably why 'lfs find -c' works for old code. I think other options such as 'lfs find -S' would fail on old code too. Could you verify this?

diff --git a/lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c b/lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
index 23691fb..42da570 100644
--- a/lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
+++ b/lustre/utils/liblustreapi.c
@@ -3338,6 +3338,8 @@ static int cb_find_init(char *path, DIR *parent, DIR **dirp,
                        if (ret != 0)
                                return ret;
                }
+
+               param->fp_lmd->lmd_lmm.lmm_magic = 0;
                ret = get_lmd_info(path, parent, dir, param->fp_lmd,
                                   param->fp_lum_size);
                if (ret == 0 && param->fp_lmd->lmd_lmm.lmm_magic == 0 &&

I think above patch can fix the problem.

[Emoly Liu]

This issue is related to the PFL patch https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/26391