[LU-994] 1.8<->2.1.54 Test failure on test suite replay-single 62

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Blocker
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.2.0
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: Zhenyu Xu
• Reporter: Maloo

Description

This issue was created by maloo for sarah <[e-mail]>

This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/c460154a-3e73-11e1-b417-5254004bbbd3.

Issue Links

• duplicates: LU-1036 1.8.7<->2.1.54 Test failure on test suite replay-single (52)

Comments

[Peter Jones]

As per Oleg ok to close - this appears because the version of 1.8.x being tested with does not contain this fix

[Peter Jones]

Yes.http://git.whamcloud.com/?p=fs/lustre-release.git;a=commit;h=8d4b77e5961c06847f9603ebc607118742ea1a51

[Zhenyu Xu]

it looks like a recovery timeout extension issue, and LU-1036 also involve the same issue. LU-889 reworks the recovery timeout extension logic.

Does the rehit in RC1 contains patch of LU-889?

[Peter Jones]

Are you sure that this is a duplicate of LU1036? It seems to relate to a different test # (62 rather than 52) and seems to still be occurring in RC1...

[Zhenyu Xu]

dup of LU-1036

[Sarah Liu]

I use default value for both obd_timeout and ldlm_timeout. So I guess they accord? Yes, AT is enabled on client side. TIMEOUT in my config file is also set to 20.

[Zhenyu Xu]

I cannot reproduce it on my vm machines.

Sarah, would you mind checking what timeout values used on server and client, do they accord? Does AT (adaptive timeout) opened on client side?

[Zhenyu Xu]

Just for the record.

MDS recoery start at 1326480370.284875, setting recovery windows in 60 seconds.

Client replay req x1390912056905666/t304942678018 (LDLM_ENQUEUE) at 1326480370.283516, and its timeout is 62 seconds

At 1326480430.284992 MDS closed its recovery window, while the replay req timedout at 1326480432.535461, so the client was evicted and failed the test.

The failure due to that the replay req's timeout time is over the MDS recovery window.

[Peter Jones]

Bobi

Could you look into this one please?

Thanks

Peter