Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Minor
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
3
-
9223372036854775807
Description
This issue was created by maloo for Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>
This issue relates to the following test suite run: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7f44a5c8-9635-11e7-b760-5254006e85c2.
The sub-test test_40 failed with the following error:
test failed to respond and timed out
from the following stack trace it looks like the client hung during NFS access:
13:23:32:[28440.201797] INFO: task tee:29977 blocked for more than 120 seconds. 13:23:32:[28440.202454] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. 13:23:32:[28440.203232] tee D ffffffff8168a850 0 29977 1530 0x00000080 13:23:32:[28440.204007] ffff880020db39b0 0000000000000086 ffff88007b4ade20 ffff880020db3fd8 13:23:32:[28440.204854] ffff880020db3fd8 ffff880020db3fd8 ffff88007b4ade20 ffff88007fd16c40 13:23:32:[28440.205666] 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff ffff88007ff5d710 ffffffff8168a850 13:23:32:[28440.206481] Call Trace: 13:23:32:[28440.206731] [<ffffffff8168a850>] ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50 13:23:32:[28440.207234] [<ffffffff8168c7f9>] schedule+0x29/0x70 13:23:32:[28440.207799] [<ffffffff8168a239>] schedule_timeout+0x239/0x2c0 13:23:32:[28440.208358] [<ffffffff81060c1f>] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x1f/0x30 13:23:32:[28440.208965] [<ffffffff8168a850>] ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50 13:23:32:[28440.209517] [<ffffffff8168bd9e>] io_schedule_timeout+0xae/0x130 13:23:32:[28440.210101] [<ffffffff8168be38>] io_schedule+0x18/0x20 13:23:32:[28440.210647] [<ffffffff8168a861>] bit_wait_io+0x11/0x50 13:23:32:[28440.211158] [<ffffffff8168a385>] __wait_on_bit+0x65/0x90 13:23:32:[28440.211722] [<ffffffff8168a850>] ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50 13:23:32:[28440.212225] [<ffffffff8168a431>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x81/0xb0 13:23:32:[28440.212875] [<ffffffff810b1be0>] ? wake_bit_function+0x40/0x40 13:23:32:[28440.213491] [<ffffffffa04d6a53>] nfs_wait_on_request+0x33/0x40 [nfs] 13:23:32:[28440.214121] [<ffffffffa04db991>] nfs_updatepage+0x151/0x8d0 [nfs] 13:23:32:[28440.214755] [<ffffffffa04cb171>] nfs_write_end+0x121/0x350 [nfs] 13:23:32:[28440.215351] [<ffffffff81181c29>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x189/0x2a0 13:23:32:[28440.216066] [<ffffffff810c54f2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20 13:23:32:[28440.216697] [<ffffffff810c54f2>] ? default_wake_function+0x12/0x20 13:23:32:[28440.217309] [<ffffffff811831a2>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1e2/0x400 13:23:32:[28440.217994] [<ffffffff81183419>] generic_file_aio_write+0x59/0xa0 13:23:32:[28440.218626] [<ffffffffa04ca15b>] nfs_file_write+0xbb/0x1e0 [nfs] 13:23:32:[28440.219221] [<ffffffff811fe18d>] do_sync_write+0x8d/0xd0 13:23:32:[28440.219796] [<ffffffff811fe9fd>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0 13:23:32:[28440.220286] [<ffffffff811fe8c7>] ? vfs_read+0xf7/0x170 13:23:32:[28440.220808] [<ffffffff811ff51f>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0 13:23:32:[28440.221338] [<ffffffff81697809>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 13:23:32:[28455.275792] nfs: server onyx-3 not responding, still trying
That being the case this TIMEOUT might very well be a DCO issue, not lustre at all.
Info required for matching: sanity-hsm 40