Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-10334

Ubuntu1604 client sanity-103a: FAIL: ACL misc test failed

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • None
    • Lustre 2.11.0, Lustre 2.10.2, Lustre 2.10.3, Lustre 2.10.4
    • server: 2.10.2 RC1
      client: Ubuntu 16.04
    • 3
    • 9223372036854775807

    Description

      client console

      [413] $ chmod 750 d -- ok
      [414] $ ls -dl d | awk '{print $1}' -- ok
      [417] $ getfacl --omit-header d -- failed
      user::rwx                             | user::rwx
      user:bin:r-x                          ? user:daemon:rwx #effective:r-x
      user:daemon:rwx #effective:r-x        ? user:bin:r-x
      group::rwx      #effective:r-x             | group::rwx #effective:r-x
      mask::r-x                             | mask::r-x
      other::---                            | other::---
      default:user::rwx                     | default:user::rwx
      default:user:bin:r-x                  ? default:user:daemon:rwx
      default:user:daemon:rwx               ? default:user:bin:r-x
      default:group::rwx                    | default:group::rwx
      default:mask::rwx                     | default:mask::rwx
      default:other::r-x                    | default:other::r-x
                                            |
      [432] $ rmdir d -- ok
      103 commands (91 passed, 12 failed)
       sanity test_103a: @@@@@@ FAIL: misc test failed
      
      

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-10334] Ubuntu1604 client sanity-103a: FAIL: ACL misc test failed

            Please use "Resolved" instead of "Closed", as that allows editing some aspects of the ticket, for example removing the always_except marker now that the test is no longer excluded.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Please use "Resolved" instead of "Closed", as that allows editing some aspects of the ticket, for example removing the always_except marker now that the test is no longer excluded.

            The fix is under LU-15259

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - The fix is under LU-15259
            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - - edited

            Andreas Dilger (adilger@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/35931
            Subject: LU-10334 tests: remove sanity 103a from ALWAYS_EXCEPT
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 8d941994455bd7377ed7c5c9b9fe58e5a4d2a6ef

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - - edited Andreas Dilger (adilger@whamcloud.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/35931 Subject: LU-10334 tests: remove sanity 103a from ALWAYS_EXCEPT Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 8d941994455bd7377ed7c5c9b9fe58e5a4d2a6ef

            John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/32047/
            Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_10
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: a6a82497eb6ed594b2cdef9aaedc8c967f2fb52f

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - John L. Hammond (john.hammond@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/32047/ Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_10 Current Patch Set: Commit: a6a82497eb6ed594b2cdef9aaedc8c967f2fb52f

            James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/32047
            Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: b2_10
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: 020d6df0d2b2cf00b21de77d34039bfb3c7ca422

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/32047 Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: b2_10 Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: 020d6df0d2b2cf00b21de77d34039bfb3c7ca422

            This issue has not been fixed, only added to ALWAYS_EXCEPT, so it should NOT be marked resolved for the 2.11 release.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - This issue has not been fixed, only added to ALWAYS_EXCEPT , so it should NOT be marked resolved for the 2.11 release.

            Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31828/
            Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set:
            Commit: 68be7b634d8e46c110f11916dd87b9f1c36a90e1

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch https://review.whamcloud.com/31828/ Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: Commit: 68be7b634d8e46c110f11916dd87b9f1c36a90e1

            James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31828
            Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu
            Project: fs/lustre-release
            Branch: master
            Current Patch Set: 1
            Commit: c64199eaa1851ec9ba5bd0d55883092f08a9a510

            gerrit Gerrit Updater added a comment - James Nunez (james.a.nunez@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: https://review.whamcloud.com/31828 Subject: LU-10334 tests: add tests to ALWAYS_EXCEPT for Ubuntu Project: fs/lustre-release Branch: master Current Patch Set: 1 Commit: c64199eaa1851ec9ba5bd0d55883092f08a9a510

            I don't think this is a real failure, just the "bin" and "daemon" users are reported in the opposite order. Maybe the test needs to sort the output from getfacl?

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - I don't think this is a real failure, just the "bin" and "daemon" users are reported in the opposite order. Maybe the test needs to sort the output from getfacl ?
            jamesanunez James Nunez (Inactive) added a comment - Logs for this failure are at: https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/8432a7b6-da27-11e7-9840-52540065bddc

            People

              simmonsja James A Simmons
              sarah Sarah Liu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: