Uploaded image for project: 'Lustre'
  1. Lustre
  2. LU-2857

2.1.4<->2.4.0 interop: sanity test_76: FAIL: inode slab grew from 11183 to 12183

Details

    • 3
    • 6920

    Description

      The sanity test 76 failed as follows:

      == sanity test 76: confirm clients recycle inodes properly ====== 01:56:01 (1361526961)
      before inodes: 11183
      after inodes: 12183
      wait 2 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 4 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 6 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 8 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 10 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 12 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 14 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 16 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 18 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 20 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 22 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 24 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 26 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 28 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 30 seconds inodes: 12183
      wait 32 seconds inodes: 12183
       sanity test_76: @@@@@@ FAIL: inode slab grew from 11183 to 12183
      

      Maloo report: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/8b6bd050-7d77-11e2-85d0-52540035b04c

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-2857] 2.1.4<->2.4.0 interop: sanity test_76: FAIL: inode slab grew from 11183 to 12183

            Fixed via LU-10131.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Fixed via LU-10131 .

            Per Patrick's comment in LU-2036:

            This appears to be fixed by:
            https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-10131
            https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/29651/

            Test passes with that patch, fails without it.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - Per Patrick's comment in LU-2036 : This appears to be fixed by: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-10131 https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/29651/ Test passes with that patch, fails without it.
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            That's what the always_except lable is used for atm

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - That's what the always_except lable is used for atm

            I purpose that a special tracker ticket be created that covers all the excepted test. This way these types of tickets will not get lost.

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - I purpose that a special tracker ticket be created that covers all the excepted test. This way these types of tickets will not get lost.

            James, I'm appreciative that you are closing old tickets, but in this case (maybe others) that are marked "always_except" it means the test that is failing has been excluded from the test list, but as James Nunez reported for 2.8.0 the test is still failing, and it does not mean that this bug is fixed.

            Either the test needs to be fixed by a code or test script fix, or if the decision is that the tested functionality is obsolete then the test should be removed completely.

            adilger Andreas Dilger added a comment - James, I'm appreciative that you are closing old tickets, but in this case (maybe others) that are marked " always_except " it means the test that is failing has been excluded from the test list, but as James Nunez reported for 2.8.0 the test is still failing, and it does not mean that this bug is fixed. Either the test needs to be fixed by a code or test script fix, or if the decision is that the tested functionality is obsolete then the test should be removed completely.

            Old ticket for unsupported version

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - Old ticket for unsupported version

            This issue is also seen on Seagate Test infrastructure quite regularly.
            Client - 2.4.3, 2.5.1.x6
            Server - 2.5.1.x6

            parinay parinay v kondekar (Inactive) added a comment - This issue is also seen on Seagate Test infrastructure quite regularly. Client - 2.4.3, 2.5.1.x6 Server - 2.5.1.x6

            sanity test 76 is still failing on master (pre-2.8.0). Recent result with logs is at https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7a914250-e8a1-11e4-b3c6-5254006e85c2

            jamesanunez James Nunez (Inactive) added a comment - sanity test 76 is still failing on master (pre-2.8.0). Recent result with logs is at https://testing.hpdd.intel.com/test_sets/7a914250-e8a1-11e4-b3c6-5254006e85c2
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre client: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_3/41/ (2.3.0) Lustre server: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/69/ (2.4.2 RC1) sanity test 76 hit the same failure: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/3c82ea6e-685e-11e3-a16f-52540035b04c
            yujian Jian Yu added a comment - Lustre client build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b1_8/258/ (1.8.9-wc1) Lustre server build: http://build.whamcloud.com/job/lustre-b2_4/44/ (2.4.1 RC1) sanity test 76 hit the same failure: https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/77da1820-15ad-11e3-87cb-52540035b04c

            People

              wc-triage WC Triage
              yujian Jian Yu
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: