[LU-3976] sanity-hsm test_9a failure: 'hsm flags on f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001

• Type: Bug
• Resolution: Fixed
• Priority: Minor
• Fix Version/s: Lustre 2.5.0
• Affects Version/s: Lustre 2.5.0
• Labels: HSM patch
• Environment: OpenSFS cluster with combined MGS/MDS, single OSS with two OSTs, four clients; one agent (c07), one with robinhood/db running (c08) and just running as Lustre clients (c09, c10)
• Severity: 3
• Assignee: James Nunez (Inactive)
• Reporter: James Nunez (Inactive)

Description

Test results are at https://maloo.whamcloud.com/test_sets/28e49004-2171-11e3-b1f0-52540035b04c

This may just be an error in the test. From John Hammond:

I think 9a is a bug in the test.
0x00000001 should be 0x00000009.

From the test log, we see

== sanity-hsm test 9a: Multiple remote agents == 10:42:31 (1379526151)
pdsh@c10: c07: ssh exited with exit code 1
pdsh@c10: c07: ssh exited with exit code 1
Purging archive on c07
Starting copytool agt1 on c07
2+0 records in
2+0 records out
2097152 bytes (2.1 MB) copied, 0.322563 s, 6.5 MB/s
Changed after 0s: from '' to 'STARTED'
Waiting 100 secs for update
 sanity-hsm test_9a: @@@@@@ FAIL: hsm flags on /lustre/scratch/d0.sanity-hsm/d9/f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001 

I think the following are harmless, but dmesg on the MDS shows the following:

Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-hsm test 9: Use of explict archive number, with dedicated copytool == 10:42:28 (1379526148)
LustreError: 30192:0:(mdt_coordinator.c:917:mdt_hsm_cdt_start()) scratch-MDT0000: Coordinator already started
LustreError: 30192:0:(obd_config.c:1346:class_process_proc_param()) writing proc entry hsm_control err -114
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: == sanity-hsm test 9a: Multiple remote agents == 10:42:31 (1379526151)
Lustre: DEBUG MARKER: sanity-hsm test_9a: @@@@@@ FAIL: hsm flags on /lustre/scratch/d0.sanity-hsm/d9/f.sanity-hsm.9a.1 are 0x00000009 != 0x00000001

Comments

[Peter Jones]

Landed for 2.5.0

[jacques-charles lafoucriere]

Patch at http://review.whamcloud.com/7723

[Jodi Levi (Inactive)]

JC is working on the patch. Assigning to James to shepherd through.

[James Nunez (Inactive)]

I'm tied up with HSM testing. So, I don't plan to create a patch for this test. Please create and submit the patch if you have time.

Thanks, James

[jacques-charles lafoucriere]

Agree: test 9a is buggy 0x00000001 must be replaced by 0x00000009 (ARCHIVED + EXIST). If you do the patch please do also following change:

• replace need2clients by needclients which will take a client count as arg

• test_9a should be changed to use needclients 3

• need2clients should be changed to use needclients 2

I can do the patch