Jinshan:
Actually, Alexey's original patch (commenting out code) removes exactly the same code as your patch:
LU-4381 lov: to not hold sub locks at initialization
Otherwise, it will cause deadlock because it essentially holds
some sub locks and then to request others in an arbitrary order.
Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
Change-Id: I00d51677aa94ec41856402fd8a027e09355786ee
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/9152
Tested-by: Jenkins
Tested-by: Maloo <hpdd-maloo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Which has been landed to master.
So, nevermind! This bug can be closed.
Reopening to close as duplicate as indicated in the comments.