Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Critical
-
Lustre 2.4.2
-
lustre-2.4.2-14chaos, ZFS OSD
-
3
-
15831
Description
Users have reported several recent cases of file corruption. The corrupt files are larger than expected, and contain all of the original written data plus additional data at the end of the file. The additional data appears to be valid structured user data of unknown origin. We have not found anything unusual in the console logs from clients or servers at the time the files were written.
In one case, the user made a copy of a Lustre directory tree using HPSS archival storage tools, then compared the copy to the original. He found one corrupt file in the copy. The original file size was 2,000,000 bytes, but the copy size was 2,097,152 (2 MiB). The archive tool reported 2,000,000 bytes written. The extra 97,152 bytes appear to be valid structured user data of unknown origin.
The corrupt file sizes are not always aligned on MiB boundaries, however. Of the cases reported so far, these are the sizes involved:
| Example # | Expected Size | Actual Size |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000000 | 2097152 |
| 2 | 1008829 | 2097152 |
| 3 | 36473 | 1053224 |
| 4 | 1008829 | 1441432 |
In Example 1, the "bad data" begins immediately at the end of the expected data, with no sparse area between. Seen below with od -A d -a, the expected data is random bytes, whereas from offset 2000000 onward the unexpected data is structured.
1999840 ! esc nul del [ dc3 + b h \ can ; f h dc4 9
1999856 D + U 1 j q g ; 7 J r { " j ) D
1999872 enq * C ` = o C & K \ a 1 D v k ht
1999888 ! A ; ff 2 " G i m 9 e dle $ si T )
1999904 9 etb nl w bel N rs R * nul eot o v p y can
1999920 1 4 $ c W l M D & 3 U J B ) t {
1999936 A del s I M dc1 esc w dc1 sp g bs dle ` sp A
1999952 nak D % l 1 r 1 W % ack ! h 0 syn c r
1999968 nak W ; b h W Z z w B stx bs " # J 7
1999984 h o $ em b V p bel ] dc2 o cr ) S del >
2000000 sp 1 1 1 9 nl B o x sp f r a c A A
2000016 sp 6 4 0 sp 6 7 9 sp 4 0 sp 7 9 sp 1
2000032 1 0 0 sp 1 1 1 9 nl B o x sp f r a
2000048 c A A sp 6 8 0 sp 7 1 9 sp 4 0 sp 7
2000064 9 sp 1 1 0 0 sp 1 1 1 9 nl B o x sp
2000080 f r a c A A sp 7 2 0 sp 7 5 9 sp 4
2000096 0 sp 7 9 sp 1 1 0 0 sp 1 1 1 9 nl B
2000112 o x sp f r a c A A sp 7 6 0 sp 7 9
2000128 9 sp 4 0 sp 7 9 sp 1 1 0 0 sp 1 1 1
2000144 9 nl B o x sp f r a c A A sp 8 0 0
In examples 2-4, there is a sparse region between the expected and unexpected data, ending on a 1 MiB boundary. Here is another od snippet illustrating the expected, sparse, and unexpected regions for example 2:
1008768 g nl . / t e s t d i r / c h m o 1008784 d s t g nl . / t e s t d i r / l 1008800 s t o r a g e nl . / t e s t f i 1008816 l e 3 nl . / z z j u n k nl nul nul nul 1008832 nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul nul * 1048576 sp 5 9 9 nl B o x sp f r a c A A sp 1048592 2 0 0 sp 2 3 9 sp 2 0 0 sp 2 3 9 sp 1048608 5 8 0 sp 5 9 9 nl B o x sp f r a c 1048624 A A sp 2 4 0 sp 2 7 9 sp 2 0 0 sp 2 1048640 3 9 sp 5 8 0 sp 5 9 9 nl B o x sp f 1048656 r a c A A sp 2 8 0 sp 3 1 9 sp 2 0 1048672 0 sp 2 3 9 sp 5 8 0 sp 5 9 9 nl B o 1048688 x sp f r a c A A sp 3 2 0 sp 3 5 9 1048704 sp 2 0 0 sp 2 3 9 sp 5 8 0 sp 5 9 9 1048720 nl B o x sp f r a c A A sp 3 6 0 sp 1048736 3 9 9 sp 2 0 0 sp 2 3 9 sp 5 8 0 sp 1048752 5 9 9 nl B o x sp f r a c A A sp 4
In all 4 examples the corrupt data resides within the second OST object. In examples 2-4 the file should have only one object. This feels like some bug is causing the second OST object to be doubly linked, and our users have partially overwritten another user's data.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
-
- Resolved
-
Activity
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/13309/
Subject: LU-5648 tests: a new test to avoid reallocated object IDs
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: 5a914ccee212c8bf4920145a6b81fad83688e1a0
Emoly Liu (emoly.liu@intel.com) uploaded a new patch: http://review.whamcloud.com/13309
Subject: LU-5648 test: add test_101 in replay-single.sh
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set: 1
Commit: 3e3939795114db6639153139935a5cd12d3b0cdd
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/12068/
Subject: LU-5648 ofd: Reject precreate requests below last_id
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: 65a17be2d9e1acdec5d9aebaed007d4cb6d0ca11
Emoly,
Could you please complete the test based on Oleg's comments found here: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5648?focusedCommentId=95011&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-95011
Thank you!
Does the second patch need to land also? http://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/12068/
Oleg Drokin (oleg.drokin@intel.com) merged in patch http://review.whamcloud.com/12067/
Subject: LU-5648 ofd: In destroy orphan case always let MDS know last id
Project: fs/lustre-release
Branch: master
Current Patch Set:
Commit: da5773e2b498a4edacc26fbf610d0b7628818d93
Landed for 2.7