Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • Lustre 2.4.0
    • None
    • None
    • 4458

    Description

      Cray is interested in bringing Linux 3.0 support to clients and servers. We'll focus on clients first since that will obviously be easiest. However, Lustre won't even configure in a Linux 3.0 environment. Initially, we plan on submitting patches to the build process going. Eventually, we'll work our way up to the server patch series. Of course, the BKL was removed and we'll be looking for suggestions on how to work around that and other major changes. I presume that RHEL will go to Linux 3.x eventually, but Cray will initially be focusing on SLES SP2. Hopefully we can find a way to make the patch sets similar.

      We'd like to at least have 3.0 clients be considered upstream for Lustre 2.3.

      Attachments

        1. 3.0-client-patches.tar.gz
          17 kB
        2. 3.0-client-patches.tar.gz
          17 kB
        3. mutex.diff
          187 kB
        4. no-autoconf-included.patch
          19 kB

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [LU-812] Support for Linux 3.0 kernels
            adilger Andreas Dilger made changes -
            Link New: This issue is related to LU-14877 [ LU-14877 ]
            adilger Andreas Dilger made changes -
            Link New: This issue is duplicated by LU-3518 [ LU-3518 ]
            pjones Peter Jones made changes -
            Fix Version/s Original: Lustre 2.1.4 [ 10158 ]
            pjones Peter Jones made changes -
            Fix Version/s New: Lustre 2.1.4 [ 10158 ]

            LU-1718 is still waiting to be landed to 2.1 branch.

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - LU-1718 is still waiting to be landed to 2.1 branch.
            pjones Peter Jones made changes -
            Resolution New: Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Original: In Progress [ 3 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]
            pjones Peter Jones added a comment -

            I think that it was just because LU-1718 was defined as a subtask - it works now that has been resolved

            pjones Peter Jones added a comment - I think that it was just because LU-1718 was defined as a subtask - it works now that has been resolved
            ys Yang Sheng added a comment -

            Stranger, I cannot close this ticket. I remember ever experienced this case. But forget how to deal with it.

            ys Yang Sheng added a comment - Stranger, I cannot close this ticket. I remember ever experienced this case. But forget how to deal with it.
            ys Yang Sheng made changes -
            Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: In Progress [ 3 ]

            Last patch has been merged. We can close this ticket especially since we have LU-1337 and LU-1994 to handle further newer kernel development.

            simmonsja James A Simmons added a comment - Last patch has been merged. We can close this ticket especially since we have LU-1337 and LU-1994 to handle further newer kernel development.

            People

              ys Yang Sheng
              spitzcor Cory Spitz
              Votes:
              3 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              21 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: